About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Debra Medina just ruined her campaign in Texas

Debra Medina is a 9/11 Truther.  She was just on Glenn Beck's show and she just torpedoed herself in her campaign for Texas Governor.  Glenn asked her if she were a 9/11 Truther, directly.  While she, of course, didn't say she was, she was very precise in her belief that there are "manny questions left unanswered" about what happened on 9/11, which is political correct code for "yeah, the government brought down the towers."

She rambled in her interview.  She wouldn't shut up and sounded like she was simply repeating talking points.  

This supposed entry from the TEA Party movement just killed her own chances politically.  The TEA Party also is now hurt from this exposure.  This is one area which has always bothered me about some in the TEA Party movement.  9/11 Trutherism is one area which shows you are a kook, plainly put.  If you don't believe radical islamic terrorists committed the attacks of 9/11, there is something wrong with you.  

She also would not disavow 9/11 Truthers, another bad move.

She cannot be trusted.

Up until this interview, I didn't know anything about her.  Now I do and Texas deserves better. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Most Offensive Townhall Blog Post...EVAH!

Two words.  Just two.  Words which have elicited the most outrageous outrage from everyone.  Including Jesus.  Perhaps even Mohammed.  Most assuredly, Buddha.

Two words.  

Consider this your warning.  Read the following two words at your own risk.  If you read the following two words, even after reading said warning, your agree to hold harmless the writer of this, the most offensive blog post ever, from all future claims against your sissified, wussified psyche.  Be further warned that if you read the following two words, you are exposing yourself to the end all, be all of offensive words, even if those words have no context, implied or otherwise, since these two words are the most offensive words ever uttered by humanity, perhaps even hamsters.

You are further cautioned that reading the following two words may incite inexorable fear of ANY word you may hear uttered or see in print for the rest of your natural life.  Just reading these words may indeed cause you to be harangued, denigrated and attacked, without mercy by those around you.  Just reading these words proves you may indeed, hate kittehs.  

This is your final warning.

Ready?

1...

2...

3...


IWARNEDYOUOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Now, if you read those two words and feel guilty, I suggest the following penance:  hitting yourself in the head repeatedly with a tack hammer.  It has the bonus of hurting and looking silly while not causing any real damage to your insensitive ash.

As a public service I offer the following video:  Highly Sensitive People - Coping Strategies

You may be wondering just how in the world I had the power to WRITE those words, let alone read them.  Don't worry.  It was nothing really, since I'm just a soulless Conservative.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Man, did THAT suck...

Thank you CBS for giving us the most boring, plain, unsurprising Super Bowl since the beginning of time!

First, the commercials.  Were there any special Super Bowl commercials on yesterday?  I saw a few, I think.  Otherwise, it was the same tired, rote, CBS self-flaggelation about NCIS, CSI and other shows.  To be fair, there were a few decent commercials.  I liked the Snickers commercial with Betty White and Abe Vigoda.  The Doritos commercial with the guys in the gym was a little funny. The Denny's commercials with the screaming chickens were funny - at first - then they just got annoying.  Otherwise, the commercials were a big disappointment.

Could the half-time show have been any more, how to say this...sad?  CBS went easy, getting the band who's song is the opening for CSI.  Pinball Wizard?  Really?  Roger Daltrey at least dressed appropriately.  Pete Townsend looked pathetic dressed as an aging hipster.  The Who sounded horrible, at least their vocals did.  The only thing decent about the half-time show was the light show.  The music, not to mention the band, was dated and sounded and looked that way as well.

The analyses.  I've noticed a definite degradation in the analysis of football games this season, mostly on CBS and NBC. Yesterday was no exception.  Phil Simms takes the dipstick award in particular.  After a simple post route by a Colt receiver, a route which Peyton Manning completed a short ten yard pass, Simms has the stones to say that that is the kind of play only manning could complete.  Really?  Only Peyton Manning could complete  a short pass on a simple post route?  Let's add that the team which scores the most points will win the game to that laser-like analysis.  After listening to Simms yesterday, now I know why there is some of the tension on the show Inside the NFL between Simms and his co-hosts, especially Chris Collinsworth.  I can't stand Collinsworth, but Simms goes to the head of the bus for moronic, simplistic, biased game analysis.

The game.  What a snore fest.  Admittedly, the on-side kick starting the second half was surprising.  But that's it.  There just didn't seem to be any intensity from either team for most of the game.  Neither team seemed to be playing as if it were the Super Bowl.  There was more of a 'shootout' in the second half of the game, but it was a little to little too late.  No big plays.  Aside from two gutsy calls from the Saints, the on-side kick and going for it on fourth and goal late in the second quarter, this was one of the most conservatively played games I've ever watched.  Just a whole lotta 'meh' in my opinion.

The NFL needs to take the game away from CBS for the foreseeable future.  This is the kind of performance which caused the NFL to take away it's franchise from CBS altogether some years ago for a period of time.  The halftime show was crap.  The commercials were crap, by and large.  The game analysis was poor and biased.  

Boring game, boring commercials, bad game analysis, awful, dated, halftime show.

Man, did THAT suck...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Music: "Choctaw Hayride"

As I sit and contemplate on a dreary and cold day here in San Antonio, waiting for the rains to come, Allison Krauss and Union Station are good company.  Enjoy them in this rendition of "Choctaw Hayride":

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Captain America Vs. TEA Partiers

Captain America, the intentionally patriotic comic book creation of the 1940's, has found a new enemy, a new nemesis, a new villain to fight in the name of...?

In the newest edition of Captain America, #602 Captain America must infiltrate and take on America's newest scourge - TEA Partiers.  No, I'm not joking.  See the first few pages of the comic herehere and here.  The iconography is there as seen in the comic's own pages, "America[n] Not Americant!", "No Government in my Medicare!", "Stop the Socialists", "America 4 Sale", not to mention the hideously anti-american phrase, "No New Taxes!"

Just a few years ago, Marvel comics put together a crossover series of comics titled 'Civil War'.  In this set of comics, the government enacts legislation requiring all persons with superpowers or who are superheroes to register with the government as "superhuman weapons of mass destruction", reveal their true identities and submit to government 'training' (what that training consisted of, I have no idea).

The superhero community breaks into two factions:  Those favoring registration, led by Iron Man and those opposing registration, led by Captain America.  The forces opposing registration incidentally, do so on the grounds that registering violates numerous civil rights.  Smelling the irony yet?

Ultimately, the pro-registration faction wins out.  How?  During a climactic battle (is there any other kind in comics?) between Iron Man and Cap, Cap is on the verge of victory when a group of civilians attempts to restrain him.  Instead of fighting those he is ostensibly fighting for, he surrender and orders the anti-registration forces to stand down.  Certain members of the anti-registration faction (like the Punisher) refuse to surrender becoming outlaws and going underground.  Captain America is arrested and led away in handcuffs.

Just analyze that for a minute.  Captain America is fighting against the idea of an entire segment of the American population having to register with the government.  Hello?  CAPTAIN AMERICA IS FIGHTING AGAINST THE IDEA OF AN ENTIRE SEGMENT OF THE AMERICAN POPULATION REGISTERING WITH THE GOVERNMENT - AND HE'S THE BAD GUY!

All of this leads, ultimately, to the assassination of Captain America by his arch nemesis (until now) Red Skull.  This villain in one form or another is either a Nazi or a Communist, depending on time frame of the comic.  The Nazi/Commie/Villain Red Skull takes advantage of events to ultimately kill Captain America - by shooting him in the back.

So, Captain America ultimately does give up his life (in this story line) for Freedom and Liberty and is laid to rest in Arlington National Cemetery.

Fast forward to 2010.

Admittedly, I don't follow Captain America (though I did buy the 'death' issue for collecting purposes) so I don't know who or what the new writers are thinking in this new thread.  Forget the borrowing from the now disgraced John Edwards with the whole "Two America's" title for the series.  Take a look at some of the lines:

"a grassroots, anti-government army."
"...looks like some kind of anti-tax thing."
"I don't exactly see a black man from Harlem fitting in with a bunch of angry, white folks."

Let me state now, for the record, I haven't read this comic and info about it is scarce.  And, admittedly, the sited pages are only three pages from an entire comic, so the reference material is a bit 'thin'.  Perhaps Cap is simply trying to keep some super-villain from using the TEA Party movement for nefarious purposes.  Perhaps.

That being said, forgive me if I'm not a bit suspicious.  Even if there is another intent, just in the sited pages, the implication is clear - TEA Partiers are what the MSNBC set has always said they were: racist, angry, anti-government rubes.  This wouldn't be the first time the comic book world has dipped it's bits into the Lefts (particularly Barack Obama's) - well, you know where I'm going with that:  Spiderman and Barack Obama.  Savage Dragon endorses Barack Obama.  Now Captain America bad mouthing the TEA Party movement as full of anti-government, angry, white folks.

Admittedly, if this is some type of attempt to influence children, it's pretty stupid.  There are very few kids who read, let alone follow, comics (or books for that matter) nowadays, there's just too many other avenues for their entertainment.  Comics have evolved over the last two decades to appeal more to people my age (collectors) or perhaps younger gamers in their mid twenties or thirties.  So why do this?

I don't know.  But even if Captain America can go after Americans for exercising their rights and freedoms (as exemplified by most in the TEA Party movement), or just those who go to rallies to voice their displeasure with an overreaching government, it's proof of one thing - there is nothing, NOTHING, safe from the encroachment of the stupid Leftist.

Addendum - In an ironic twist, there is an interesting side story involving Spiderman as a result of the superhero 'Civil War'. Spiderman was on the pro-registration side of the battle.  Iron Man, the leader of the pro-registration faction, in fact became his mentor.  Spidey complied with the new government law, removed his mask, and revealed his true identity to the public.  What did Spidey get in return for his loyalty to the government?  The Kingpin, one of Spidey's arch nemisi, shot his Aunt May.   In return for getting Aunt May healthy again, Spidey made a deal with Mephisto (another enemy) which ultimately cost Spidey his marriage.  Oh, and Spidey's identity was also secret again.  

So, in complying with the government, Spidey's Aunt was shot by an enemy, he had to make a deal with an enemy (appeasement?), he lost his marriage to his true love, and had to have his identity hidden again knowing what consequences could result from complying with the new law.

Liberals never think anything through...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American People to Obama: "You Lie!"

New polling shows that the stupid, tone-deaf, American public, too interested in American Idol and Heidi Montag's butt implants, simply aren't listening to the awesomeness of President Obama.

Put simply, the people, regardless of how many speeches the president makes or how often he or his sycophants in his administration tell us we're to stupid to understand his words, simply aren't buying his particular brand of bullshinola.

While Democrats in Congress are busy demonizing the American people by calling us Nazis, and while media fluffers like Keith Olbermann are busy endearing themselves and the administrations policies to Americans by calling us "teabagging, racist homophobic sexists" we've told Obama and his minions time and time again to, basically, pound sand.

Of course the response is to "not give up" and to "continue to fight", unless that fight is against America's foreign enemies that is, but I digress.  You see, once the Democrats and President Obama ram this (healthcare, cap and trade, etc.) down our throats, we'll all simply roll over, finally able to grasp the super-awesomeness of Obama's and the Democrats wisdom.  We'll all blindly submit. You see, it'll only hurt for a few minutes - just like when a vampire sinks his teeth into your flesh, or when the Borg inject those nasty little nanites into your body.  Once it's done, we'll all be good little drones, servants of the Hive.

Even with poll results like these, the Democrats and Obama's mantra is "Resistance is Futile!"  All we need do is add our biological and technological distinctiveness to them - and it will all be Unicorns and Skittles.

You know what I say to that?  "No!  NOOOO!  I will not sacrifice the country!  We've made too many compromises already, too many retreats.  They invade our space and we fall back.  They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back.  The line must be drawn, HERE, this far, NO FARTHER!  AND I WILL MAKE THEM PAY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE!"

*WHEW!*

Got a little carried away with the Borg analogies there, sorry.  I really 180'd this post, huh?

Anyway, what was I writing about?  Oh, yeah - the people have had it with this crap.  They, we, aren't listening to the lies anymore.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming 'Thought of the Day'

If global warming/climate change is responsible for colder, severe Winter weather, how come it doesn't snow in August?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Greenpeace sole source of IPCC Coral Reef Data

Lots of haranguing and much gnashing of teeth from global warmists about how the rising temperature of the earth is killing off the oceans coral reefs.  Just type into Google the search terms "global warming kills coral reefs", there is no shortage of alarmist media and propaganda.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has come under increasing fire for its inclusion of non-peer reviewed articles used to make it's points in it's 2007 (its latest) climate report.  Most recently, the IPCC has used the World Wildlife Federation as a source for claims global warming and 'climate change' is damaging the Amazon rain forest.  The WWF is hardly an un-biased, scientific organization.  It is in fact a lefty, activist organization.  However, I could see how someone could at least make the case the WWF is an organization who is simply interested in conservation and saving animals.

Greenpeace on the other hand suffers from no such illusions.  Greenpeace is a full-bore, lefty, activist organization bent on furthering their own agenda through any means possible.  They have been connected to eco-terrorists and their radical agenda is well known.  Now it is revealed the UN IPCC has sited Greenpeace as the sole source for the information contained within their climate report making the case global warming is killing coral.

Is this the "overwhelming scientific evidence" President Obama is touting to justify his 'climate bill/energy bill/cap and trade bill'? Evidence gathered from non-scientific, non-peer reviewed, indeed, activist organizations?   

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SOTU, Satire or S.T.F.U?

If you watched the State of the Union speech last night, you were witness to a historical event.  For the first time in the history of our Republic, a sitting President stood before the assembled branches of our government and the American people and satarized his own first year in office.

Oh, and flipped the 'Bird' to the American people.

There is no other explanation.  

"But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We can’t wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side — a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of — (applause) — I’m speaking to both parties now. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants shouldn’t be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual senators." (Applause.)

As I said, there is no other explanation.  Did President Obama actually say that?  Yes he did.  That he said it with a straight face proves it is satire.  There is further proof this is satire.  A man who gave 411 speeches, 42 news conferences and 158 interviews could not possibly believe the words he spoke.  The president said "We can't wage a perpetual campaign..." 

Not that 'we', won't.

How about our President (PBUH) again telling us, telling the American people that had we just paid attention to what he has been saying, we'd already have 'health care'?

"Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, the process left most Americans wondering, "What's in it for me?""

This small paragraph is a giant S.T.F.U. to the American people.  He is correct that he "didn't explain it clearly".  Within a two day time frame, he changed his tune on health care three times!  This was back in July!  Obama himself said the time for action was "now", that "debate is good" but it's time, basically shut up and give me what I want.  This was before the August recess.  Before the energized public slammed their Congressional representatives showing THEY DO NOT WANT OBAMA'S IDEA OF 'HEALTH CARE'!  

Throughout Obama's speech runs the "if you dumb rubes would just" meme.  Something else telling is the last line of the excerpt above, "What's in it for me?"  This belies a fundamental misunderstanding of the American people.  The American people KNEW what was in it for them!  THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE TOLD YOU TO STUFF IT! 

Read the full text of the speech.  You tell me - is the satire?  Is the president telling the American people to S.T.F.U?  Both? Neither?

Surely he wasn't serious...?

NOTE:  The language filter flagged me for the S.T.F.U.  I edited it so it would be accepted.  I understand the purpose of the language filter, but in this case, I think my language is justified and appropriate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama refers to himself 132 times - IN ONE SPEECH!

Video:


Just remember he'll "fight for you", if he deigns to remember you over his own - Awesomeness that is...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wherein I call Brett Favre a Nitwit

Can we stop with all the Brett Favre adulation now, please?

This guy has thrown three game-losing interceptions in the final moments of three NFC Championship games.  He did it against the Eagles, the Giants and now the Vikings.  Last night's interception catapulted Brett into the category of official 'Bonehead'.

Yeah, the guy is a great quarterback.  He has all the records - not all of them positive by the way.  He's won a Superbowl.  He got league MVP awards.  He's won some outstanding games over his long career.  He's overcome adversity, drug addiction.  He even played a game right after he found out his father has passed away!  The guy is a legend, but it is time to go into that good night.

Favre had the crap kicked out of him yesterday by the Saints.  I don't particularly care for Favre or the Vikings for that matter, but even I was cringing for the guy near the end of the game.  He even came back out and played hurt after twisting his ankle! He's a tough nut to crack, I'll give him that.  But did anyone see the looks on the face of his family?  After all of the accolades, records and legend status accrued by Favre over the last few years, is a game really worth tormenting your family?

Listen, I understand about having passion and a 'love for the game'.  I have spent my entire adult life in the military.  I recently retired after just over twenty-two years.  I know what it's like to have to evaluate a 'lifetime' and career.  I know what it's like to leave something you love.  But you come to a time when you have to be selfish I think.  I could have spent another four years in the service had I wanted to.  But physically, I would have been beat up (more than I already am BTW).  My body has taken such a pounding over the last two+ decades, I've had multiple surgeries over the last three years of my service career.  I could have stayed in the service another four years, but had I gotten out at forty-four or forty-five years of age and not been able to DO anything, is that worth it?  All it takes is one hit.  A true warrior knows when it's time to retrograde.

Spending twenty years in the military takes it's toll.  The stress, living conditions (from time to time), deployments, PT, you name it, all tasks your body - sometimes to it's limits (and beyond).  When your twenty, it's no big deal.  When you're forty and you can't get through the day without the help of anti-inflamitories and pain killers - ummm, it's time to hang it up and get into bird watching or something.

Brett Favre has had to deal with this and it's telling about his character as to how he's dealt with it.  He's played for three teams in the last three years.  He left the Packers hanging when he left them.  He wasn't really productive with the Jets last year.  He's had a  great season with the Vikings this year, but again at what cost?  Every interview has been about Brett Favre.  Even in the pre-game yesterday, the media attention was on Favre.  Favre had a blowup with his coach a few weeks ago and has rubbed elbows with him a few times over the season.  Football is a team sport and when one person becomes the focus - not because of anything other than the 'legend' and 'spectacle' of the one guy - then it's also time to go.

Brett Favre may be considered by many to be the greatest quarterback to have ever played the game.  He deserves all due respect for his accomplishments over the last 19 years, no doubt.  But it is time for him to go.  The longer he plays, the more excuses and justifications he gives to himself to go "just one more year", the more he says he "has one more good season" in him, the more he is diminishing his accomplishments and making the journey about his ego than about the game.

His interception last night at the end of the game was a mistake any rookie would make.  It's the one cardinal sin of a quarterback to throw a pass back across your body the way Favre did.  Sometimes a QB will get away with it.  Favre didn't last night.  He ended the dream of another team to get to the Superbowl with that mistake.  Was it a simple error or a decision born of hubris?

Only Brett Favre can answer that question.  But he has demonstrated a trend in three Championships (just saying that - three Championship games!  How many great QB's throughout NFL history have ever been to just ONE Championship game?) now and three times he's come up short.  It's time for Brett Favre to retire.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NASA Purging 'inconvenient' IPCC Climate Data

Instead of independently verifying sited UN climate data, NASA decided it best to simply parrot the alarmist UN IPCC mantra on glacial melt.  Now that information has been proven bogus, NASA has egg on it's face.

Instead of doing the honorable (let alone the journalistic and scientifically credible) thing and deleting the data on their site - with an accompanying retraction and explanation - they simply changed it, deleting the old data, making it appear as if their assertions were accurate all along.

Before image of NASA site (thanks to GOOGLE Cache):

nasa_climate_evidence_before.jpg


After image:


nasa_climate_evidence_after.jpg


Notice highlighted areas before and after.  How about the scientifically vague assertion that "glaciers are retreating almost everywhere"?  Of course glaciers retreat, sometimes they also advance and grow as well, yet there is no vague reference to this possibility at the NASA site.  Also notice the Kilimanjaro photo; the point they are making that the Kilimajaro snow is disappearing due to global warming, when it's local deforestation - NOT global warming.


The pattern of obfuscation, inaccuracy and downright fraud continues unabated on all issues related to "climate change" and our own NASA is going right along with it.  Gotta keep that federal grant money coming after all...


More here.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Find a market and exploit it

Homeless to be used to generate electricity in Detroit.

Oh, not by getting them jobs at an energy plant or anything.  By putting them on a treadmill or stationary bike and letting them 'energycize'!  Over the years, I heard various attempts to get homeless people off the streets and back to work as exploitive of their lifestyle.  Funny, no such outrageous outrage from the Left about this plan so far.

Forgive me if I'm being a bit facetious, but this seems in some way to be just a little to close to the plot of "The Matrix":

The Green Gym will be the first of its kind. Nowhere else in the country have such innovations been implemented for the benefit of homeless citizens. In addition to standard fitness equipment such as two weight machines, boxing bags, and a treadmill, 10 Green Revolution Technology™ enabled stationary bikes will generate electricity to be redirected into Cass' power grid. Over one year of four daily classes, a full class of 10 at the Green Gym can generate enough power to light 36 homes for a month, or three homes for a year!

The Blog Prof makes some interesting points:

There are a few points of interest in this story. One is that unpaid homeless labor will essentially be used to power part of the building, for their own good of course. The other is that this effort is being undertaken to fight obesity in the homeless community. Let me repeat that - obesity in those have have no job, transportation or home, which essentially tells you how good we have it in this country in this day and age. Just a century ago, portly bodies were a sign of wealth. Today, those that haven't a darned thing but the shirt on their back are too fat for their own good. 

Pretty soon, this new initiative may take on even more 'green' connotations:


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamacare only "mostly dead"


The 'conventional' wisdom at this point is the Democrats would be crazy to try this (reconciliation).  But if they didn't they wouldn't be Democrats now, would they?

Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, tellsNational Review Online that House Democrats are planning to use the budget-reconciliation process in order to pass Obamacare. “They’re meeting with each other this weekend to pursue it,” says Ryan. “I’ve spoken with many Democrats and the message is this: They’re not ready to give up. They’ve waited their entire adult lives for this moment, and they aren’t ready to let 100,000 pesky votes in Massachusetts get in the way of fulfilling their destiny. They’ll look at every option and spend the next four or five days figuring it out."
(The Princess Bride idea from Hot Air)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Matthews & Dean: A Singularity of Crazy


In this case however, Advantage: Matthews
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive