About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

CO2: Creating an Ice Age near you!

You'll get a big kick out of this. How many years has it been, going on 22 years now at least for Jim Hansen, where we -- the unwashed masses -- have been told again and again, that CO2, that most evil of evil gases, will be the death of us all -- by roasting the planet.


"Filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gases associated with global warming could push the planet into a new Ice Age, scientists have warned.

Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the Earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide that was completely covered with ice, the daily telegraph reported."

Here's where things get a little confusing in this article. Ostensibly, the article is making the point that the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to new glaciation and possibly a new ice age. But in this next paragraph, they forget to mention CO2 but instead mention global warming as the cause of said ice age.

"Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the University's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.

While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.

This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the Earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulfate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said."

So my friends there you have it. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere, the bane of all civilization, will now not result in the melting of the polar ice caps and the flooding of the planet as predicted by the Goracle in his movie "An Inconvenient Truth". According to the climate alarmists, now we're all doomed by the evil CO2 to be turned into Gorecicles. And this new cooling is caused by all the new warming.

Color me skeptical on this new alarmism. Something tells me in four or five months when spring finally arrives, these stories of global catastrophe through a new Ice Age will revert yet again to how we're all doomed by roasting to death due to Earth's fever.

Just as the Democrats are scrambling around after their defeat in Massachusetts, after the Climategate e-mails came out a few months ago, the climate alarmists are scrambling for answers in respect to the very cold, and in some places, extreme winter. Record cold along with record snows has got them all in a tizzy. Of course there are still some diehard alarmists who tout the extreme heat in the southern hemisphere in places like Australia. My answer to that would be, "Did you hear about the summer snows in Australia last week?"

In keeping with the Massachusetts model, just like the Democrats, the climate alarmists are doubling down on their wackiness.

When will they learn?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate Video of the Day

We need this in our Congress.  I like Senator Inhofe, but has be called Al Gore a crook as a matter of the Congressional record?  Watch the video:


(H/T: WUWT)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hitler not happy with Scott Brown, Obama

Stay with it to the end, funny as hell!  Video:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama FAIL

Let us count the ways, in no particular order:

Virginia - FAIL
New Jersey - FAIL
Massachusetts - FAIL
Chicago Olympics - FAIL
Copenhagen (Cap & Trade) - FAIL

Of course, losing the Olympics is kind of bittersweet, but I don't feel to bad.  With the arrogance on display - from the punditry of the Left in particular - this one was deserved.

Of course we could add to this the legislative FAILS, but the context for those is somewhat different.  All of the above situations are where President Obama - personally - made appeals for the particular candidate or position - and he failed miserably in every case.

I've asked this question in several forums today and will repeat it again here:  All we've heard about Obama for the past two and a half years is that this guy is, in essence, "Black Jesus".  He himself said if elected he would "heal the planet and cause the seas to recede".  Humility, thy name is not Obama.

Anyway, if President Obama cannot help the democrat candidate, who had a 20+ point lead only a month ago, in the bluest of blue states - Massachusetts, in a seat held by the uber Democrat (socialist) Ted Kennedy for over forty years - just how effective is this guy?

Yep.  I've been a bit cynical of late, especially when it comes to health care legislation.  The election in Massachusetts gives me hope.  If the people of MA can do what is right, if even they can demonstrate they aren't simply a tool for furthering someone else's power - then there is real hope.  Not the platitudinal fake "Hope&Change" type hope either.  Real, honest to goodness - 

Hope.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pentagon to whitewash Ft. Hood massacre

Well, it seems the department of defense is going to whitewash the massacre at Fort Hood. According to this story, Bill Bennett has analyzed and 80+ page document from the Pentagon in which the words Islam or Muslim -- never appear.

If you read the linked article, it's obvious that the military -- STILL -- will not come to grips with the fact that this country is fighting an Islamic enemy. We will never be able to win a fight or battle, let alone the war until this country comes to grips with the fact that these fanatics want us dead.

Over the last few months of my retirement from the military (Air Force,) I have reflected on the many years I spent serving my country. Over the last few years, especially as a senior noncommissioned officer, it became readily apparent to me that many people in the upper echelons of military leadership just don't get it. The military is a bureaucracy, everybody knows that. What most people don't know, is the extent or the politicized nature of that bureaucracy.

For my next remarks, most of what I'm going to say is a generalization. I spent 22 years in the United States Air Force and know the nature of the service and the military. Not everyone in a leadership position in the military is a moron. That being said, a good percentage of those in leadership positions are morons as anyone who's spent any time in the military knows. That being said, a lot of senior officers in the military, once they've reached a certain position (or rank) stay in those positions, attempt to get a higher rank, or attempt to obtain a senior job position (Wing Commander, Numbered Air Force commander, other senior military position) -- through politics. Political correctness is rampant in various sectors of the military, especially those dealing with any type of cultural or religious issue.

A few years back, I'm not exactly sure what year was, perhaps the early 1990s, Satanists were given permission and allowed to perform their ceremonies on base, at military chapels. Why? Because of supposed "discrimination". Can you believe that? If you are any type of practicing Christian, can you believe that the United States military would allow a Satanist to perform their blasphemous rituals in the same place you would take communion? This is the kind of ridiculousness that permeates the military today. It's no wonder the DOD would try to sweep the religious aspects of the Fort Hood murders under the carpet.

The report is chock-full of platitudes and psycho-babble. For good measure, they even threw in a reference to white supremacists being a danger to society. From the excerpt read at the linked article, it seems like this report could've simply had the header and footer changed from the Homeland Security report last summer. That the Department of Defense, the very organization tasked with protecting all of us and the country, and fighting the war on terror, doesn't have the courage to address the real problems and dangers posed by the Fort Hood killer, is offensive.

But you would be reading a complete and total whitewash. You'd be reading a lie of a report. But that is what the Pentagon has produced.

Here was a situation where an Islamist reached out to Islamist imams like Anwar Awlaki who has worked with other terrorists, including 9/11 hijackers. Where he had a business card that read "Soldier of Allah," Where he yelled "Allahu Akbar" as he opened fire on fellow soldiers and Americans. Where he delivered a lecture and said "non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire." Where he told his neighbor the morning he set off on his rampage that "I'm going to do good work for God." Where he said his allegiance was "to sharia law" not "American law" when asked by his colleagues. Where his classmates said "no one would . . . have trusted him with anything."

And yet he was made a major. And yet he was educated by the U.S. military. And yet he was kept in the U.S. military. And he then went to war with the United States.

How will this play for the defense of Major Hasan? Will they use this report to downplay his obvious religious fanaticism? If the Department of Defense is not willing to admit that Al Qaeda has any connection to this event (even though Maj. Hassan had contact with Al Qaeda operatives) then in my eyes any connection to terrorism is at the very least muted. Oh, I suppose they could make the case this was an act of domestic terrorism but that completely ignores the fact that this simply wasn't the act of a "lone gunman".

Hassan is a terrorist. He murdered American servicemen based on his devotion to his Islamic faith. The Army is ignoring that. They are doing it purposefully which makes this all the more insulting and offensive.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blogging with MacSpeech Dictate

This is my first blog post on Townhall using the new MacSpeech Dictate software.

This entire post, as short as it is, is being written entirely through speech recognition software using my new iMac, a headset microphone, and the new MacSpeech Dictate software.

So far so good.

It's surprising how good the interface between the software and the Townhall site is. I've even done a little bit of editing along with the writing. As I said so far it's working pretty good.

I'm more more impressed with Apple products, computers and software. This will take some getting used to. The literature says the more you use it the more intuitive the program becomes, which is good for blogging and will ultimately be good for my writing. I can do the writing, editing, etc. all without having to touch the keyboard. Actually, using the Townhall interface, the dictation is coming out a lot better than the practicing what I was doing and the programs Notepad. The hardest part is going to be learning all the commands for the program. This gives me a great excuse to do more blogging just so I can get a hang of the program and how everything works.

It looks like I'll have to manually type in hyperlinks, pictures, videos, etc. from the Townhall menus since the interface I don't think will work with the program, but that's a small price to pay. The more and more I use this, even on a simple blog post -- the more more impressed I become. All the writing/typing, editing, etc. without even touching the keyboard. As I said earlier, all it will take is getting to learn all of the commands and getting my voice to catch up with my mind when I want to type something out.

More to follow.

Addendum:  After reading the post, there were a few grammatical errors in the text, just a couple.  Not bad though for a first effort!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's NEW Pastor, also a 'Bush Basher'

This guy is pretty ballsy.  Not the same kind of strident rhetoric from Jeremiah Wright, but to say this, knowing it for what it is with Obama sitting right there!  I'm sure the Jeremiah Wright moments aren't to far away.  

Video:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I hate to be a killjoy...

Perhaps everyone getting all fired up about Scott Brown winning in Massachusetts should, perhaps, temper their enthusiasm - just a bit?

Look, I'm all for Brown winning.  The Dems need to get kicked in the chones on this one.  They need to have their elitist, arrogant attitudes shoved where the sun don't shine.  A Scott Brown victory would be a great way to accomplish that.

That being said, a lot of money, energy, enthusiasm and expectation are being poured into the Brown race by many grassroots types on the Right.  Regardless of the polls, regardless of the punditry and regardless of those same expectations there are a few things to keep in mind:

1)  MA is a bluer than blue state.
2)  The voters in MA haven't sent anyone right of Stalin (a bit of hyperbolic embellishment, I know) to Congress for something like forty years.
3)  The Democrat party apparatus is in full force there.  ACORN, SEIU and others are probably waiting to stuff just the right amount of ballots should the need arise.  I say that in all seriousness.  If there is anyone who thinks those organizations wouldn't stuff a ballot box, your being extremely naive.  Also, be on the look out for the zombie vote.  Zombies have been electing and returning Democrats to office in Illinois for decades.

There are many other reasons to think that a Scott Brown win in MA is still a long-shot.  Anyone on the right would do well to not put all their hopes in one basket.  The midterms are ten months away.  Brown may win.  He may lose.  In either case, the battle doesn't end.  

Keep enough of an energy reserve - just in case. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A sad truth of the Haitian earthquake

Tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Haitians may have been killed in yesterday's earthquake.  Let me write that again - perhaps hundreds of thousands of people dead!  

That death toll will increase in the weeks and months ahead.  You can add deaths from injuries sustained during the quake, the deaths coming from starvation, disease, you name it.  Lack of any reliable infrastructure to begin with is adding to the death toll, but this problem will only magnify the effects of the quake.

Here mankind is, entering the second decade of the 21st Century and half a million people may be dead, millions certainly negatively impacted - from an earthquake.  Doesn't this bother anyone but me?  

I don't want to get bogged down in details, but let's be honest, Haiti - economically, politically, in almost any measurement of civilization - is a backward place.  Poverty is through the roof.  What little infrastructure there is, is spotty at best.  Their 'government', as it has for decades, is only interested in one thing - corruption.  Corruption pervades everything and this will also add to the ultimate toll.

Medical facilities were some of the hardest hit by this quake.  They could barely keep themselves above water before the quake, now they are, for all intents and purposes, non-existant.   Sanitation?  Food?  Clean water?  All of these were hard enough to come by during the best of times.  Now?  Also, non-existant.

The saddest part of the death toll is that it didn't have to be this way.  A 7.2 quake is powerful, to be sure, but not necessarily devastating.  By contrast, a magnitude 7.8 quake hit San Francisco in 1906.  The resulting death toll was 3,000 (estimated).  

sf_1906.gif


The 1906 quake hit an early 20th century city.  A city whose population at the time was over 400,000.  A city whose entire skyline was almost completely obliterated (look at the picture above).  Medical care and technology of the time though was able to respond and mitigate the after effects.  That only 3,000 people died is a miracle.

The Prince William Sound earthquake of 1964 was a magnitude 9.2!  A tsunami also resulted from the quake adding to the destruction and ensuing chaos and affected not only Alaska, but parts of Canada and reached Hawaii!  Only 128 people died.

One of the costliest (monetarily) natural disasters to ever hit the United States was the Northridge earthquake in 1994.  It was a magnitude 6.7, resulting in 72 deaths.

I'm not trying to make a political point on the back of so much destruction, yet a correlation can be made nonetheless.  A people who are allowed to prosper, who are allowed to create a way of life embracing freedom and bolstered by ideas of self-determination, economic choice and personal liberty is better equipped to deal with adversity, especially natural disaster.


Even here in the United States, we get hammered from time to time.  Not only the earthquakes mentioned above, but in other ways.  Take Hurricane Katrina in 2005.  Though elements of the recovery were botched, the city of New Orleans was back on it's feet within a year.  Those elements which most negatively impacted recovery efforts (outside of FEMA) were those which reflect the problems faced by Haiti - corruption and indifference of politicians, a criminal police force (in some cases only, not all the cops in NO were scumbags), reliance of the populace on the government.


Every year, the United States get hit with hurricanes and tropical storms, earthquakes, hell even volcanic eruptions from time to time.  Yet we are able to attend to ourselves and recover within relatively short timelines - days to weeks in some cases. Whenever natural disaster hit other nations, notably 'third-world' ones, tens or hundreds of thousands of people die - for no reason other than indifference.  People in third world countries don't care if their 'house' was thrown together by a group of people two-thirds of which can't read.  I've been to third world countries.  I've seen how "the other half" lives - in cardboard houses with soda can roofs. 


The Next time you hear anyone making cracks about how we in the US live, how selfish or greedy Americans are and criticizing us for our 'rampant consumerism' and saying should live more like the other half, just remember the real travesty is if the other half lived more like us, we wouldn't be mourning quite so many dead every year across the planet.  


Point to Haiti.  If that doesn't shut them up, then they deserve to be kicked in the teeth for their stupidity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wind Power fails in UK during cold snap

Renewable energy?  Only during ideal weather conditions it would seem:

The cold weather has been accompanied by high pressure and a lack of wind, which meant that only 0.2pc of a possible 5pc of the UK's energy was generated by wind turbines over the last few days.

Jeremy Nicholson, director of the Energy Intensive Users Group (EIUG), gave warning that this could turn into a crisis when the UK is reliant on 6,400 turbines accounting for a quarter of all UK electricity demand over the next 10 years.

"This week's surge in demand for energy in response to the cold weather raises serious concerns about the UK's increased reliance on wind power," he said.

"We need to ensure that energy can be quickly accessed in times of peak demand through improved gas storage and investment in clean-coal and nuclear power stations.

"Failure to address these concerns could mean further rationing of energy in future years and could even lead to black-outs, so it is vital that the UK Government takes action now to avoid the lights going off."

So windpower failed at just the moment more energy was needed to meet demand due to the weather.  If the UK had actually taken a gun and actually shot themselves in the foot, they couldn't have given themselves a deeper wound.  Wind turbines only work when the wind blows.  Solar plants can only collect energy when the sun is shining.  During bad weather and during the night, other power generation methods are needed and fossil fuel/nuclear is it, regardless of the handwringing of the enviro-wacko.

How 'bout lets not go down the same route here in the US. mmmkay?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Movie Review: "Daybreakers"

Who's up for another vampire movie?  I was, especially one with the premise of 'Daybreakers':  A virus has transformed almost all of the worlds population into vampires.  What humans there are left are hunted for their blood, or are already farmed for their blood to supply the vampire population with food.

Spoilers Follow:

This movie had a bit of the 'zombie' outbreak feel to it, as in what would happen if the world were overrun by the undead.  In this case, not much.  Oh, there was apparently some type of conflict in the beginning as vampirism spread throughout the world, but as is stated in the movie, "humans lost".  I didn't take that as a thinly veiled reference to the Obama administration though now that I think about it...nah.

At some point in 2009, some type of vampiric virus ravaged the planet.  Almost everyone was transformed into vampires. Vampires run everything and society runs pretty much as it does now, though during the night.  The world has become a more fascistic place - though you can still stop at your local coffee house for a hot cup a joe, lace with hemoglobin, not half-and-half.

The only problem in this world is that it is running out of food.  Everywhere.  No nation on Earth is safe from starvation.  I suppose one could make the connection this is a veiled reference to supposed rampant consumerism and use of natural resources, but I didn't get that as an intended message.  In this world, food is quite literally running in short supply.  When almost your entire population has become vampiric, where do you get your food?  

Those humans left are either hunted for that reason or, once captured, placed into a Matrix-like contraption to farm them of their blood. 

UPDATE:

I had typed out a finished review for this movie and tried to post it yesterday at the same time Townhall dumped apparently.  I don't remember all the info I put in the review and frankly don't have the energy to try to right it all again anyway so I will finish the review thusly:  not a bad flick, but wait for the movie to come out on DVD.  It suffers from a lack of development and detail, you want more information on the virus amongst other details for example.  The ending elicited laughter in the theater and it was a bit ridiculous, but for a popcorn flick it's not bad.

2 out of 5 Stars.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Judge tosses out most evidence against terrorist'

Here we go.  As with the Flight 253 bomber pleading 'not guilty' this is why the military tribunal system was created - to recognize the differences between war criminals and common street thugs.

Un. Frickin. Believable.

More analysis at AoSHQ.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unemployment, Illustrated

stormtrooper-star-wars-demotivational-poster.jpg

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: "Unemployment still pointing in right direction."

unemployment.jpg

Really?


Three months now of double digit unemployment.  How long will the trend last?


When is our President going to pull his head out of his butt and take responsibility for this also?


(H/T: Gateway Pundit)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Panty-Bomber pleads "Not Guilty"

Another show trial on the way to demonstrate the absurdity of treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive