Posted by
Catmman on Wednesday, October 27, 2010 7:04:12 PM
Wrap your head around this logic. Four Justices on the United States Supreme Court have an issue about the safety of a drug
specifically meant to kill. Read this little tidbit:
A judge had put the execution on hold because she said she was "left to speculate" whether this drug was safe for its intended use.
Logically speaking, how 'safe' is any drug whose specific intent is to kill? Is that what the defense and the liberal Justices were going for here? If they can now say lethal injection drugs are unsafe since they are intended to kill, can't they short-circuit the death penalty?
File this one under other Supreme Court precedent cases Water vs Wet, Ice vs Cold, Liberals = Stupid.