About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Recovering from colostomy takedown

Been out of the loop for awhile.

Been home for a week from my five days in the hospital.  My colostomy takedown was a success.  The doc had to remove another six inches of my colon which was still diseased from the diverticulosis/diverticulitis infection a few months back.  The procedure went well, though longer than the doctor had planned by about an hour.

A few differences with this surgery from my colostomy procedure back in February.  I have problems with anesthesia - it makes me very sick upon recovery from surgery and with a major abdominal operation, vomiting is a non-starter.  It has also caused my heart to stop in the past.  If the anesthesiologist isn't on complete top of things, I can go under to much, to easy.  I had to be coded back in 1992 after my appendectomy.   

This time, the anesthesiologist recommended an epidural for post-op pain management and to alleviate the need for some anesthesia during surgery.   Worked well.  It was a bit weird waking up and not being able to feel my legs normally, but it wasn't too bad.  It did work pretty well for pain management (with some tweaking of the catheter two days after surgery), which kept me from having to use so much morphine post-op.  The anesthesiologist team also did an AWESOME job!  I had ZERO post op nausea or vomiting - NONE!  They gave me some chemo anti-nauseau medication pre-op and whatever other drugs they gave me, whatever the cocktail was really worked well.  Kudos.

I developed a pretty back 'pressure ulcer' (bed sore) at the top of my bum after only one day in the hospital.  I also developed a bit of an infection in the site where my stoma was located.  The doc opened that area back up on the third second day after surgery.  It's still open and I have to do twice daily wet-dry dressing changes, but after a week of anti-biotic treatment it's healing well, though it is a pain and hurts a bit.  The doc removed all of the scar tissue from the previous surgery, of which there was a lot so he said so now the scar I'll have will be just as long, but not nearly as wide as it was before.

The doc pulled the staples out of my abdominal incision after only seven days on my first follow up after the surgery and discharge.  A day later, a small section of the bottom part of the incision closest to my crotch started to open a bit.  My wife put some steri-strips over the spot to help it stay closed.  This area of the abdominal incision is causing me the most discomfort, but it isn't too bad.  The abdominal incision is a little over a foot long.  The doc had to 'dig' into my pelvis to get to the lower part of my colon pouch still attached to my rectum after the original surgery.  Plus the machines used to staple my colon and rectum back together need a good bit of working space - I was splayed open pretty good from what I understand.

Due to the pressure ulcer, I have to sit and sleep on special air mattresses/cushions so it can heal right.  Its kind of a pain to sit normally, but I'm getting better every day.

This recovery is a bit slower than what I experienced from my surgery back in February, but I'm progressing well, all things considered.  I experienced a few post-op complications this time, so things are a bit slower.  The biggest thing is that my appetite is taking forever to bounce back, I don't know why.  Only in the past few days has it started to normalize, but it's still not where it should be.  No fevers or anything, it's just kinda weird.  Sleeping has gotten better though, even with having the pressure ulcer and sleeping on the air mattress.

The wound nurse was pretty ticked about the pressure ulcer.  Apparently it's a big deal, showing the nursing staff wasn't/isn't making sure the patient - in this case me - isn't being looked after properly.  In a partial defense of the staff, I was up and walking around the evening of the day after my surgery and was getting up walking around about every two hours thereafter until I was discharged, even during the night.  I was up and around all the time so I wasn't simply laying in bed vegetating. Ambulating is a big deal in the hospital after surgery.  It helps prevent blood clots (of which I'm at risk since developing a DVT in my right arm after shoulder surgery back in 2007).  It helps prevent getting lung infections.  I was sure to do the small breathing exerciser every time I got out of bed.  Physical therapy also came by and gave me exercises to do since I was on an epidural and my legs needed to get back to working normally.  Alas, even when you do everything you are supposed to, complications can arise.

Also a big plus was that my wife was allowed to stay with me in the hospital.  I hate being 'tied' down in the hospital.  All the IV tubes, the leg pressure cuffs which also help to prevent blood clots.  I also cannot stand how the narcotics for pain control affect my mind.  They make my head feel 'fuzzy' and I have a tendency to get anxiety attacks if everything comes together properly, especially at night.  I get 'antsy'.  Then start to feel somewhat claustrophobic.  Then all hell can break loose.  My wife is awesome at helping me through things when that happens.  It happened a couple of times.  It wasn't bad, but my wife was there.  Had she not been allowed to stay, it could have been 'interesting' to say the least.  I don't know what the deal was.  I was on the same floor, same ward as I was three months ago and they didn't allow her to stay.  This time they did.  It was nice.

My biggest complaint was the food.  It was four days before I was allowed to have food (counting the day of the surgery when you can't have anything by mouth after midnight).  Starting with a 'liquid' diet, then graduating the next day to normal or 'regular' diet.  The food was awful, truly awful.   Wilford Hall used to be the place to go for lunch.  The food, though not 'great' compared to not being hospital food, was tasty and not bad.  Now it's bland, tasteless 'goo'.  The hospital must have changed food contractors or something.  The funny thing is, the food was fine when I was in back in February.  I don't know what the deal is, but now it is terrible.

The recovery continues.  I'm just now getting back into reading the blogs and wanting to blog so things will be a bit slow for awhile.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cinco de Mayo

I always preferred Miracle Whip.

It is illegal to celebrate Cinco de Mayo in Arizona, due to a long ban on mayo in the state. Anyone seen illegally possessing mayo will automatically be deported to Mexico on a first offense, Venezuela on a second offense, and Detroit on a third. This often gets Arizona compared to the Nazis because of an urban legend about the Nazis hunting down jars of mayo as a Jew-collaborator, though in reality Hitler put on mayo on everything.

Everything.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Environmentalism's Insane Dichotomy

Let's examine the current BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico through the eyes of an environmentalist wacko:

"This is an ecological catastrophe!"

"This will harm the environment for decades to come!"

"We must do SOMETHING!" (stated in a manic scream)

"We have to act to save the environment and protect the fragile marine ecology!"

"Save the whales, birds, fish, shrimp, dolphins, otters, etc, blah, blah, ad nauseum!"

In response, chemical dispersants are needed.  The dispersants break up the oil, causing it to sink below the surface of the water where natural bacteria can "eat" the oil. 
 
Let's examine the response to the use of chemical dispersants on the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico through the eyes of an environmentalist wacko:

"This is an ecological catastrophe!"

"This will harm the environment for decades to come!"

"We must do SOMETHING!" (stated in a manic scream)

"We have to act to save the environment and protect the fragile marine ecology!"

"Save the whales, birds, fish, shrimp, dolphins, otters, etc, blah, blah, ad nauseum!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anti-illegal protesters attacked in San Francisco

The MSM and Democrat/Liberal politicians have scoured TEA Party rallies for over a year looking for the supposed inherent violence associated with this "extreme, right-wing" movement.

All they had to do was look to their own:

In San Jose, thousands of marchers headed to an evening rally at city hall. In San Francisco, a separate demonstration wrapped up in the afternoon, but not without a bit of trouble.

Three people were attacked and at least two others were arrested. The people assaulted were part of the Minutemen demonstration, a group in favor of Arizona's new immigration law.

They said a large group of immigrants' rights supporters followed them to the BART station on Market Street and started punching and kicking them, and calling them names.

"They said we were racists, and we were against them, and against their town, and against San Francisco," said Parker Wilson with the Bay Area National Anarchists. "What they were saying, they said we need to get out and called us racists, and that we need to go home. And then they just attacked my friends and me."

Those arrested will likely be charged with felony assault and robbery. In the meantime, the rest of the rally got vocal but not physical. 

"A bit of trouble."

"The rest of the rally got vocal, but not physical."

Anyone else ticked off to high heaven about how this report just glosses over the political violence of the Left?

Had any TEA Party rally had even the slightest hint of violence, it would be a clarion call from the Left!  The "I told you so's" and "See, see?!  They ARE racists!" would be on every news broadcast, in every left-wing print publication and all over the nutroots blogosphere to this day!

Yet three counter-protesters were assaulted and robbed due to their differing political viewpoint and the color of their skin and we hear nothing from the MSM.  15 businesses were vandalized as a part of a "pro-immigration rally" in San Jose.  We hear nothing from the MSM.  Signs at so-called immigration rallies depicted Arizona Governor Brewer as a Nazi (one such image here) and Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio as a Klansman.  In this case we see nothing from the media (there is a sixteen picture photo essay accompanying this article, yet not one picture showing any of the Nazi imagery, though it is mentioned prominently in the text of the article).  Yet every time a LaRouchian Democrat shows up at a TEA Party rally depicting President Obama in a Hitler mustache, it's an indictment of every TEA Partier in the nation as fascist racists.

Reasonable people who simply want immigration law enforced are called racists, fascists, Nazi's, the Gestapo, etc and are branded un-American and nativist.  Actual criminal thugs committing acts of actual racism and physical assault on those with differing viewpoints and are advocating either ignoring or the actual circumvention of immigration law are branded Patriots and their actions, no matter how illegal or destructive, are simply excused away as the expressions of a repressed people.  

More here.

Things are becoming more Orwellian every day...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nazi Germany - AWESOME?

We can't keep illegals from coming to the United States to live and work.  Liberals/Democrats keep telling us illegals come here to make a better life for themselves and for their children.  Liberals/Democrats keep telling us we need comprehensive immigration reform so we can give these illegals a "pathway to citizenship" so they can "come out of the shadows".

Liberals/Democrats (and some Republicans) are also telling us now that our nation of such bounty, freedom and boundless Liberty is EXACTLY like Nazi Germany.  In case you had forgotten thanks to the hyperbolic ravings of the Left, Nazi Germany is the country which in 1939 unleashed six years of horrendous war and was responsible for the near genocide of Jews with over six million murdered and millions of others of different racial, ethnic and religious views also murdered, the result of the Nazi's "Final Solution."

I seem to recall tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people fleeing or attempting to flee Nazi Germany (Google it), not trying to enter it to "make a better life for them and their children."

Why would so many on the Left (and on the Right) want a "pathway to citizenship" for so many in a place "reminiscent of Nazi Germany"?

Stop with the endless comparisons of immigration law, most recently Arizona's immigration law, as "reminiscent of Nazi Germany"?

If you can't, at best your an ill informed moron.  At worst your attempting to make a crass political point on the souls of the tens of millions tortured, robbed, raped and murdered by the real Nazis.

* Post inspired by this tweet from IMAO:  "Anyway, my conclusion is thus:  if you think a place is just like Nazi Germany, don't try to sneak in there."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are you 'Exceptional'? If not, you're dead

Great? Britain is making health care decisions based on a persons worth.  What other conclusion to take from this:

A CANCER patient has been denied NHS funding for a new cancer drug which could add years to his life.

Controversially, Nice uses a formula which calculates whether life-extending drugs represent good value for money.

Last night, Mr Johnstone said: “They have told me that they don’t think my case is exceptional. What exactly do they call exceptional? Who isn’t exceptional?”

The James Whale Fund for Kidney Cancer has said it was “criminal” that patients in England are being denied access to the new drug.

Both trusts said they had declined funding because of the Nice guidance and the lack of exceptionality in both cases.


Who could possible be so heartless to make such value judgements?  Britain's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence under the auspices of Britain's National Health Service.

There comes a time when (some) people may have to balance family financial well being with the benefit of staying alive.  I know it's uncomfortable to deal with, but its true.  Some families/people cannot afford, in certain circumstances, to continue paying for health care.  The difference is those decisions should be up to the individual or the family - NOT THE GOVERNMENT! When you give the government control over your health care, this is exactly what happens.  Now the government is responsible for paying your bills, not the individual/family so the decision making power is the governments alone and individual needs become subordinate to the 'needs of the many'.

This is the 800lb gorilla in the room.  Most people ignore stuff like this since most people won't have to deal with circumstances like this - until they get old.  But people don't think about that either.  All they hear is "free health care" and all they want is "gimme, gimme, gimme".  By the time the 'bill' comes due, it's to late for the individual to do anything about it.  The government will string you along, you'll appeal the decision, you'll literally make an appeal to the government for your life and by the time the bureaucracy gets around to sending you a letter denying your appeal anyway, you'll be dead.

This is what nationalized health care gives you folks - death.  Supposed value judgements on a persons life, not based on their own value as a human life, but on a cost-benefit analysis based on what is 'in the best interests' of the collective

Extra:  What exactly is the definition of 'Exceptional' anyway?  Most would think that it would be anyone who contributes 'exceptionally' to society.  This is a fallacy and lets just skip right on past the visions of collectivism this brings to mind.  

A cynic might think that this would mean the 'super-rich'.  This also is a fallacy.  If you're super rich, your not letting the government pay for your health care anyway since it sucks at providing it.  Oh, you may use the governments doctors and facilities, but you'll pay the bill out of your own pocket - you can afford to.

So what exactly is 'Exceptional'?

IMO it is anyone who belongs to the 'protected' class.  It would be anyone beneficial to the operation of the government.  The government will deny this of course, saying that it would be anyone beneficial to 'society' or the 'community'.  If your politics or philosophy or ideology don't mesh with that of those in power with the government (Society, Community) then you aren't really exceptional, are you?  

You're simply a selfish individualist, literally thinking about your own skin - not about the 'greater good'.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »