About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

American People to Obama: "You Lie!"

New polling shows that the stupid, tone-deaf, American public, too interested in American Idol and Heidi Montag's butt implants, simply aren't listening to the awesomeness of President Obama.

Put simply, the people, regardless of how many speeches the president makes or how often he or his sycophants in his administration tell us we're to stupid to understand his words, simply aren't buying his particular brand of bullshinola.

While Democrats in Congress are busy demonizing the American people by calling us Nazis, and while media fluffers like Keith Olbermann are busy endearing themselves and the administrations policies to Americans by calling us "teabagging, racist homophobic sexists" we've told Obama and his minions time and time again to, basically, pound sand.

Of course the response is to "not give up" and to "continue to fight", unless that fight is against America's foreign enemies that is, but I digress.  You see, once the Democrats and President Obama ram this (healthcare, cap and trade, etc.) down our throats, we'll all simply roll over, finally able to grasp the super-awesomeness of Obama's and the Democrats wisdom.  We'll all blindly submit. You see, it'll only hurt for a few minutes - just like when a vampire sinks his teeth into your flesh, or when the Borg inject those nasty little nanites into your body.  Once it's done, we'll all be good little drones, servants of the Hive.

Even with poll results like these, the Democrats and Obama's mantra is "Resistance is Futile!"  All we need do is add our biological and technological distinctiveness to them - and it will all be Unicorns and Skittles.

You know what I say to that?  "No!  NOOOO!  I will not sacrifice the country!  We've made too many compromises already, too many retreats.  They invade our space and we fall back.  They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back.  The line must be drawn, HERE, this far, NO FARTHER!  AND I WILL MAKE THEM PAY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE!"

*WHEW!*

Got a little carried away with the Borg analogies there, sorry.  I really 180'd this post, huh?

Anyway, what was I writing about?  Oh, yeah - the people have had it with this crap.  They, we, aren't listening to the lies anymore.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming 'Thought of the Day'

If global warming/climate change is responsible for colder, severe Winter weather, how come it doesn't snow in August?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Greenpeace sole source of IPCC Coral Reef Data

Lots of haranguing and much gnashing of teeth from global warmists about how the rising temperature of the earth is killing off the oceans coral reefs.  Just type into Google the search terms "global warming kills coral reefs", there is no shortage of alarmist media and propaganda.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has come under increasing fire for its inclusion of non-peer reviewed articles used to make it's points in it's 2007 (its latest) climate report.  Most recently, the IPCC has used the World Wildlife Federation as a source for claims global warming and 'climate change' is damaging the Amazon rain forest.  The WWF is hardly an un-biased, scientific organization.  It is in fact a lefty, activist organization.  However, I could see how someone could at least make the case the WWF is an organization who is simply interested in conservation and saving animals.

Greenpeace on the other hand suffers from no such illusions.  Greenpeace is a full-bore, lefty, activist organization bent on furthering their own agenda through any means possible.  They have been connected to eco-terrorists and their radical agenda is well known.  Now it is revealed the UN IPCC has sited Greenpeace as the sole source for the information contained within their climate report making the case global warming is killing coral.

Is this the "overwhelming scientific evidence" President Obama is touting to justify his 'climate bill/energy bill/cap and trade bill'? Evidence gathered from non-scientific, non-peer reviewed, indeed, activist organizations?   

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SOTU, Satire or S.T.F.U?

If you watched the State of the Union speech last night, you were witness to a historical event.  For the first time in the history of our Republic, a sitting President stood before the assembled branches of our government and the American people and satarized his own first year in office.

Oh, and flipped the 'Bird' to the American people.

There is no other explanation.  

"But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We can’t wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side — a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of — (applause) — I’m speaking to both parties now. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants shouldn’t be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual senators." (Applause.)

As I said, there is no other explanation.  Did President Obama actually say that?  Yes he did.  That he said it with a straight face proves it is satire.  There is further proof this is satire.  A man who gave 411 speeches, 42 news conferences and 158 interviews could not possibly believe the words he spoke.  The president said "We can't wage a perpetual campaign..." 

Not that 'we', won't.

How about our President (PBUH) again telling us, telling the American people that had we just paid attention to what he has been saying, we'd already have 'health care'?

"Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, the process left most Americans wondering, "What's in it for me?""

This small paragraph is a giant S.T.F.U. to the American people.  He is correct that he "didn't explain it clearly".  Within a two day time frame, he changed his tune on health care three times!  This was back in July!  Obama himself said the time for action was "now", that "debate is good" but it's time, basically shut up and give me what I want.  This was before the August recess.  Before the energized public slammed their Congressional representatives showing THEY DO NOT WANT OBAMA'S IDEA OF 'HEALTH CARE'!  

Throughout Obama's speech runs the "if you dumb rubes would just" meme.  Something else telling is the last line of the excerpt above, "What's in it for me?"  This belies a fundamental misunderstanding of the American people.  The American people KNEW what was in it for them!  THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE TOLD YOU TO STUFF IT! 

Read the full text of the speech.  You tell me - is the satire?  Is the president telling the American people to S.T.F.U?  Both? Neither?

Surely he wasn't serious...?

NOTE:  The language filter flagged me for the S.T.F.U.  I edited it so it would be accepted.  I understand the purpose of the language filter, but in this case, I think my language is justified and appropriate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama refers to himself 132 times - IN ONE SPEECH!

Video:


Just remember he'll "fight for you", if he deigns to remember you over his own - Awesomeness that is...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wherein I call Brett Favre a Nitwit

Can we stop with all the Brett Favre adulation now, please?

This guy has thrown three game-losing interceptions in the final moments of three NFC Championship games.  He did it against the Eagles, the Giants and now the Vikings.  Last night's interception catapulted Brett into the category of official 'Bonehead'.

Yeah, the guy is a great quarterback.  He has all the records - not all of them positive by the way.  He's won a Superbowl.  He got league MVP awards.  He's won some outstanding games over his long career.  He's overcome adversity, drug addiction.  He even played a game right after he found out his father has passed away!  The guy is a legend, but it is time to go into that good night.

Favre had the crap kicked out of him yesterday by the Saints.  I don't particularly care for Favre or the Vikings for that matter, but even I was cringing for the guy near the end of the game.  He even came back out and played hurt after twisting his ankle! He's a tough nut to crack, I'll give him that.  But did anyone see the looks on the face of his family?  After all of the accolades, records and legend status accrued by Favre over the last few years, is a game really worth tormenting your family?

Listen, I understand about having passion and a 'love for the game'.  I have spent my entire adult life in the military.  I recently retired after just over twenty-two years.  I know what it's like to have to evaluate a 'lifetime' and career.  I know what it's like to leave something you love.  But you come to a time when you have to be selfish I think.  I could have spent another four years in the service had I wanted to.  But physically, I would have been beat up (more than I already am BTW).  My body has taken such a pounding over the last two+ decades, I've had multiple surgeries over the last three years of my service career.  I could have stayed in the service another four years, but had I gotten out at forty-four or forty-five years of age and not been able to DO anything, is that worth it?  All it takes is one hit.  A true warrior knows when it's time to retrograde.

Spending twenty years in the military takes it's toll.  The stress, living conditions (from time to time), deployments, PT, you name it, all tasks your body - sometimes to it's limits (and beyond).  When your twenty, it's no big deal.  When you're forty and you can't get through the day without the help of anti-inflamitories and pain killers - ummm, it's time to hang it up and get into bird watching or something.

Brett Favre has had to deal with this and it's telling about his character as to how he's dealt with it.  He's played for three teams in the last three years.  He left the Packers hanging when he left them.  He wasn't really productive with the Jets last year.  He's had a  great season with the Vikings this year, but again at what cost?  Every interview has been about Brett Favre.  Even in the pre-game yesterday, the media attention was on Favre.  Favre had a blowup with his coach a few weeks ago and has rubbed elbows with him a few times over the season.  Football is a team sport and when one person becomes the focus - not because of anything other than the 'legend' and 'spectacle' of the one guy - then it's also time to go.

Brett Favre may be considered by many to be the greatest quarterback to have ever played the game.  He deserves all due respect for his accomplishments over the last 19 years, no doubt.  But it is time for him to go.  The longer he plays, the more excuses and justifications he gives to himself to go "just one more year", the more he says he "has one more good season" in him, the more he is diminishing his accomplishments and making the journey about his ego than about the game.

His interception last night at the end of the game was a mistake any rookie would make.  It's the one cardinal sin of a quarterback to throw a pass back across your body the way Favre did.  Sometimes a QB will get away with it.  Favre didn't last night.  He ended the dream of another team to get to the Superbowl with that mistake.  Was it a simple error or a decision born of hubris?

Only Brett Favre can answer that question.  But he has demonstrated a trend in three Championships (just saying that - three Championship games!  How many great QB's throughout NFL history have ever been to just ONE Championship game?) now and three times he's come up short.  It's time for Brett Favre to retire.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NASA Purging 'inconvenient' IPCC Climate Data

Instead of independently verifying sited UN climate data, NASA decided it best to simply parrot the alarmist UN IPCC mantra on glacial melt.  Now that information has been proven bogus, NASA has egg on it's face.

Instead of doing the honorable (let alone the journalistic and scientifically credible) thing and deleting the data on their site - with an accompanying retraction and explanation - they simply changed it, deleting the old data, making it appear as if their assertions were accurate all along.

Before image of NASA site (thanks to GOOGLE Cache):

nasa_climate_evidence_before.jpg


After image:


nasa_climate_evidence_after.jpg


Notice highlighted areas before and after.  How about the scientifically vague assertion that "glaciers are retreating almost everywhere"?  Of course glaciers retreat, sometimes they also advance and grow as well, yet there is no vague reference to this possibility at the NASA site.  Also notice the Kilimanjaro photo; the point they are making that the Kilimajaro snow is disappearing due to global warming, when it's local deforestation - NOT global warming.


The pattern of obfuscation, inaccuracy and downright fraud continues unabated on all issues related to "climate change" and our own NASA is going right along with it.  Gotta keep that federal grant money coming after all...


More here.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Find a market and exploit it

Homeless to be used to generate electricity in Detroit.

Oh, not by getting them jobs at an energy plant or anything.  By putting them on a treadmill or stationary bike and letting them 'energycize'!  Over the years, I heard various attempts to get homeless people off the streets and back to work as exploitive of their lifestyle.  Funny, no such outrageous outrage from the Left about this plan so far.

Forgive me if I'm being a bit facetious, but this seems in some way to be just a little to close to the plot of "The Matrix":

The Green Gym will be the first of its kind. Nowhere else in the country have such innovations been implemented for the benefit of homeless citizens. In addition to standard fitness equipment such as two weight machines, boxing bags, and a treadmill, 10 Green Revolution Technology™ enabled stationary bikes will generate electricity to be redirected into Cass' power grid. Over one year of four daily classes, a full class of 10 at the Green Gym can generate enough power to light 36 homes for a month, or three homes for a year!

The Blog Prof makes some interesting points:

There are a few points of interest in this story. One is that unpaid homeless labor will essentially be used to power part of the building, for their own good of course. The other is that this effort is being undertaken to fight obesity in the homeless community. Let me repeat that - obesity in those have have no job, transportation or home, which essentially tells you how good we have it in this country in this day and age. Just a century ago, portly bodies were a sign of wealth. Today, those that haven't a darned thing but the shirt on their back are too fat for their own good. 

Pretty soon, this new initiative may take on even more 'green' connotations:


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamacare only "mostly dead"


The 'conventional' wisdom at this point is the Democrats would be crazy to try this (reconciliation).  But if they didn't they wouldn't be Democrats now, would they?

Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, tellsNational Review Online that House Democrats are planning to use the budget-reconciliation process in order to pass Obamacare. “They’re meeting with each other this weekend to pursue it,” says Ryan. “I’ve spoken with many Democrats and the message is this: They’re not ready to give up. They’ve waited their entire adult lives for this moment, and they aren’t ready to let 100,000 pesky votes in Massachusetts get in the way of fulfilling their destiny. They’ll look at every option and spend the next four or five days figuring it out."
(The Princess Bride idea from Hot Air)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Matthews & Dean: A Singularity of Crazy


In this case however, Advantage: Matthews
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CO2: Creating an Ice Age near you!

You'll get a big kick out of this. How many years has it been, going on 22 years now at least for Jim Hansen, where we -- the unwashed masses -- have been told again and again, that CO2, that most evil of evil gases, will be the death of us all -- by roasting the planet.


"Filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gases associated with global warming could push the planet into a new Ice Age, scientists have warned.

Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the Earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide that was completely covered with ice, the daily telegraph reported."

Here's where things get a little confusing in this article. Ostensibly, the article is making the point that the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to new glaciation and possibly a new ice age. But in this next paragraph, they forget to mention CO2 but instead mention global warming as the cause of said ice age.

"Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the University's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.

While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.

This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the Earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulfate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said."

So my friends there you have it. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere, the bane of all civilization, will now not result in the melting of the polar ice caps and the flooding of the planet as predicted by the Goracle in his movie "An Inconvenient Truth". According to the climate alarmists, now we're all doomed by the evil CO2 to be turned into Gorecicles. And this new cooling is caused by all the new warming.

Color me skeptical on this new alarmism. Something tells me in four or five months when spring finally arrives, these stories of global catastrophe through a new Ice Age will revert yet again to how we're all doomed by roasting to death due to Earth's fever.

Just as the Democrats are scrambling around after their defeat in Massachusetts, after the Climategate e-mails came out a few months ago, the climate alarmists are scrambling for answers in respect to the very cold, and in some places, extreme winter. Record cold along with record snows has got them all in a tizzy. Of course there are still some diehard alarmists who tout the extreme heat in the southern hemisphere in places like Australia. My answer to that would be, "Did you hear about the summer snows in Australia last week?"

In keeping with the Massachusetts model, just like the Democrats, the climate alarmists are doubling down on their wackiness.

When will they learn?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate Video of the Day

We need this in our Congress.  I like Senator Inhofe, but has be called Al Gore a crook as a matter of the Congressional record?  Watch the video:


(H/T: WUWT)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hitler not happy with Scott Brown, Obama

Stay with it to the end, funny as hell!  Video:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama FAIL

Let us count the ways, in no particular order:

Virginia - FAIL
New Jersey - FAIL
Massachusetts - FAIL
Chicago Olympics - FAIL
Copenhagen (Cap & Trade) - FAIL

Of course, losing the Olympics is kind of bittersweet, but I don't feel to bad.  With the arrogance on display - from the punditry of the Left in particular - this one was deserved.

Of course we could add to this the legislative FAILS, but the context for those is somewhat different.  All of the above situations are where President Obama - personally - made appeals for the particular candidate or position - and he failed miserably in every case.

I've asked this question in several forums today and will repeat it again here:  All we've heard about Obama for the past two and a half years is that this guy is, in essence, "Black Jesus".  He himself said if elected he would "heal the planet and cause the seas to recede".  Humility, thy name is not Obama.

Anyway, if President Obama cannot help the democrat candidate, who had a 20+ point lead only a month ago, in the bluest of blue states - Massachusetts, in a seat held by the uber Democrat (socialist) Ted Kennedy for over forty years - just how effective is this guy?

Yep.  I've been a bit cynical of late, especially when it comes to health care legislation.  The election in Massachusetts gives me hope.  If the people of MA can do what is right, if even they can demonstrate they aren't simply a tool for furthering someone else's power - then there is real hope.  Not the platitudinal fake "Hope&Change" type hope either.  Real, honest to goodness - 

Hope.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pentagon to whitewash Ft. Hood massacre

Well, it seems the department of defense is going to whitewash the massacre at Fort Hood. According to this story, Bill Bennett has analyzed and 80+ page document from the Pentagon in which the words Islam or Muslim -- never appear.

If you read the linked article, it's obvious that the military -- STILL -- will not come to grips with the fact that this country is fighting an Islamic enemy. We will never be able to win a fight or battle, let alone the war until this country comes to grips with the fact that these fanatics want us dead.

Over the last few months of my retirement from the military (Air Force,) I have reflected on the many years I spent serving my country. Over the last few years, especially as a senior noncommissioned officer, it became readily apparent to me that many people in the upper echelons of military leadership just don't get it. The military is a bureaucracy, everybody knows that. What most people don't know, is the extent or the politicized nature of that bureaucracy.

For my next remarks, most of what I'm going to say is a generalization. I spent 22 years in the United States Air Force and know the nature of the service and the military. Not everyone in a leadership position in the military is a moron. That being said, a good percentage of those in leadership positions are morons as anyone who's spent any time in the military knows. That being said, a lot of senior officers in the military, once they've reached a certain position (or rank) stay in those positions, attempt to get a higher rank, or attempt to obtain a senior job position (Wing Commander, Numbered Air Force commander, other senior military position) -- through politics. Political correctness is rampant in various sectors of the military, especially those dealing with any type of cultural or religious issue.

A few years back, I'm not exactly sure what year was, perhaps the early 1990s, Satanists were given permission and allowed to perform their ceremonies on base, at military chapels. Why? Because of supposed "discrimination". Can you believe that? If you are any type of practicing Christian, can you believe that the United States military would allow a Satanist to perform their blasphemous rituals in the same place you would take communion? This is the kind of ridiculousness that permeates the military today. It's no wonder the DOD would try to sweep the religious aspects of the Fort Hood murders under the carpet.

The report is chock-full of platitudes and psycho-babble. For good measure, they even threw in a reference to white supremacists being a danger to society. From the excerpt read at the linked article, it seems like this report could've simply had the header and footer changed from the Homeland Security report last summer. That the Department of Defense, the very organization tasked with protecting all of us and the country, and fighting the war on terror, doesn't have the courage to address the real problems and dangers posed by the Fort Hood killer, is offensive.

But you would be reading a complete and total whitewash. You'd be reading a lie of a report. But that is what the Pentagon has produced.

Here was a situation where an Islamist reached out to Islamist imams like Anwar Awlaki who has worked with other terrorists, including 9/11 hijackers. Where he had a business card that read "Soldier of Allah," Where he yelled "Allahu Akbar" as he opened fire on fellow soldiers and Americans. Where he delivered a lecture and said "non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire." Where he told his neighbor the morning he set off on his rampage that "I'm going to do good work for God." Where he said his allegiance was "to sharia law" not "American law" when asked by his colleagues. Where his classmates said "no one would . . . have trusted him with anything."

And yet he was made a major. And yet he was educated by the U.S. military. And yet he was kept in the U.S. military. And he then went to war with the United States.

How will this play for the defense of Major Hasan? Will they use this report to downplay his obvious religious fanaticism? If the Department of Defense is not willing to admit that Al Qaeda has any connection to this event (even though Maj. Hassan had contact with Al Qaeda operatives) then in my eyes any connection to terrorism is at the very least muted. Oh, I suppose they could make the case this was an act of domestic terrorism but that completely ignores the fact that this simply wasn't the act of a "lone gunman".

Hassan is a terrorist. He murdered American servicemen based on his devotion to his Islamic faith. The Army is ignoring that. They are doing it purposefully which makes this all the more insulting and offensive.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »