About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Thoughts of the Day

How Obama is like FDR.  Obama also sold out Eastern Europe.

How Obama is unlike Lincoln.  Obama is losing a war.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Admin argues against medical liability

The Obama administration argues that making government medical officials personally liable for damages would make it harder to recruit people to work for the Health and Human Services Department's Public Health Service and other government medical jobs.

"The court of appeals' decision will likely have an adverse impact on the government's ability to recruit, hire and retain medical personnel for the PHS, and may affect other federal entities that have medical missions covered by similar immunity statutes." Solicitor General Elena Kagan said in court papers.

If I'm reading this right, then the Obama administration is arguing you cannot sue government medical practitioners if they screw up.  Maybe there is something I'm not seeing here, but the implications of this are mind-bending.

So if/when Obamacare passes, you will have no legal recourse against government doctors or health care providers if they either make a mistake or through their omission of care cause harm or death?  Is that too far a stretch to make?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another September Anniversary

22 years today of active service in the United States Air Force.

32 more days and I'll be officially retired after 22 years, one month and one day of active military service.

Huzzah for me!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It wasn't RAPE-rape

So says the eminent leftist philosopher and barracks-lawyer, Whoopi Goldberg.

It wasn't RAPE-rape?!  What exactly is RAPE-rape then, Whoopi?  Is it someone forcing themselves on you?  Is is using drugs and alcochol to make the victim more pliable for the assault?  Is forced sodomy while crying "No" rape?  So "NO" doesn't mean "NO" anymore, Whoopi?

A 13 year old girl was sexually assaulted by a 40-something year old man.  The victim said "No" several times.  The criminal drugged and gave alcohol to the victim.  After the sexual assault, the victim was sodomized, all again while saying "No".  The criminal admitted to the crime, plead guilty and was convicted.  The criminal then fled the country before any sentencing could take place.

None of those facts are debatable.  None in question.  Not one.

Bill Clinton has a tryst with a woman other than his wife in the White House, then lied about it before a Grand Jury.  We were told what happens in the privacy of someones bedroom isn't anyone's business.  Ted Kennedy killed a woman, left her to suffocate.  But Teddy wanted universal health care so it's all good.  Mary Jo would have wanted things this way.  This guy Polanski rapes a thirteen year old girl.  But give the guy a break since he made some movies and it was 30 years ago and he's a good father now, blah, blah, blah.

The same people who say the kinds of things above are the same ones who have the stones to say we have a moral obligation to turn over our liberty for the sake of single-payer health care.  That Jesus himself would be for government health care.  That we have a moral obligation to stand up for the little guy and those less fortunate.

Unless you are a 13 year old girl.

All of you scumbags on the Left who are standing up for this POS - you can go straight to hell.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More embarassment for UN on climate

The United Nations published the following graph in this climate report, the 2009 Climate Change Science Compendium:
 
The Hanno graph used by the United Nations Climate Change Science Compendium 2009, published last week to coincide with the summit attended by President Barack Obama and other world leaders.
 
This graph was published in the linked Compendium for use at the New York summit attended by President Obama.  As Harold Ambler notes:  "...the origin of a graph used in last week’s UN climate report, was not an august team of scientists working around the clock, but rather Wikipedia."  You read that right.  The UN, instead of gathering and using material from actual, published climate scientists, went to their source of record - Wikipedia.
 
Perhaps equally surprising was the revelation that the graph’s author was not a climatologist, but rather an obscure Norwegian ecologist, Hanno Sandvik, who claimed no expertise regarding the data used in his graph. Misidentified in the UN report as “Hanno,” Sandvik politely distanced himself from the graph as the story unfolded. The UN report authors, meanwhile, had given a scientist they had never met or heard of the appearance of scientific legitimacy.
 
Another shot to the 'credibility' of the UN on climate.  How much of the rest of the 'data' in their report isn't legit?   More here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Deliver Us Obama!"

Are these people praying to Obama?  Video:



"Hear our Cry Obama!"

"Deliver Us Obama!"

As a palate cleanser, I offer yet another video of kids chanting and singing the praises of Hope&Change:



LOL line of this little ode?  "Being both (black and white), Obama will not take sides."

Unless you're a white cop.

Methinks these people project the God complex.

Update:  Are they saying "Obama" or "Oh God"?  I've listened to this again a few times and I guess it could be either or.

(H/T: Hot Air)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Three cheers for Rationing

According to the Washington Post, rationing isn't such a bad deal.  All they want to do is make sure you get the health care you need.  Of course the phrase "the health care you need" is the big pink elephant in the room.  When anyone, especially if they are proponents of government-controlled 'health care', talk about giving you only what you 'need' they are talking about the very thing they are trying to convince you they aren't - to ration your care.



But these kinds of stories are rare.  Right?

You know, I've had my own dealings with this kind of system being in the military, and it nearly cost me my voice.  It was discovered in 2005 that I probably had hyperparathyroid disease.  The disease results in an increase in blood calcium levels.  Initially, it isn't noticeable by the patient.  Over time if left untreated, it can lead to bone weakness. osteoporosis and other degenerative disease of the bones.  In other cases, it can cause seious complications with the skeletal and nervous system.  Sometimes it is an indication of cancer.

Anyway, in 2005 blood tests revealed I may have this disease.  Imaging studies didn't reveal a possible tumor in my parathyroid glands (which are located in the neck, behind the thyroid gland itself).  At that point I was asymptomatic (not showing symptoms) so the decision was made to 'watch my condition' and see what developed.  Over a period of three years, my blood calcium levels remained high.  I became vitamin D deficient.  And the parathyroid tumor that wasn't discovered in 2005 continued to grow.

In late 2007, I suffered from a cervical problem which caused nerve pain in my bac, neck and shoulder.  It was excruciating.  On a trip to the emergency room, the doctors decided to do a CAT scan to rule out the possibility that I had developed a thrombosis in my lung which they said could be a cause for the pain.  The CAT scan turned out negative, except for finding a spot in my neck.  I knew immediately, a gut feeling, that it was a parathyroid tumor.

A follw up ultrasound confirmed the presence of a tumor in the area of the parathyroid glands.  Subsequent imaging consisting of a sestimibi scan and a attempted biopsy of the site showed no tumor present.  The doctor was still hesitant to perform the surgery since I was still conventionally asymptomatic and my blood calcium levels weren't traditionally high and there were no other real indicators of a parathyroid tumor.  But the ultrasound and CT scan found something, so the decision was made to operate.

During surgery, the doctors confirmed it was indeed a parathyroid tumor.  It was the size of a walnut.  A normal parathyroid gland is the size of a grain of rice.  The only problem was that the tumor had intertwined itself around my right laryngeal nerve (there is one on either side of the neck).  This nerve controls the larynx, or voice box.  Your larynx does more than simply give you a voice.  It is a valve which helps with respiration and the swallowing of foods and liquids.  If the nerve is severed or damaged, not only can the ability to speak be lost, but breathing and swallowing can be affected.  A normal parathyroid operation with an experienced doctor should take less than an hour.  My operation took almost three times as long.  It took the doctors so much time since they had to remove the tumor from my laryngeal nerve.  The tumor they should have found three years earlier. 



I've blogged about this before, but it is a good personal example.  My own experience with medical care are mostly of the military health care system over the last 22 years.  It is a government run system.  It is 'free'. My experience isn't so much an example of rationing as you see in the attached videos, but an example of dealing with the waits imparted on the system due to bureaucracy and doctors who are overwhelmed.  In fact, I take that back.  It is an example of rationing.  The military health care sustem has finite resource and people within the system must wait for what is available.

Was the ENT doctor motivated to not do anything more than wait on my parathyroid due to being overwhelmed?  Due to my lack of symptoms, he had other pressing matters to deal with, sure.  But his schedule didn't allow for a real evaluation of my case, a real personal one on one which may have led him to think mine was a special case.  The system also didn't provide for any type of referral to a specialist or a civilian doctor either. 

In every instance where major injury or surgery was needed to resolve a problem, I've had to wait an inordinate amount of time.  Three years for resolution of a parathyroid tumor.  It took almost seven months to get a shoulder repair surgery - in the intervening seven months, my arm was in a special immobilizer and I was on pain medication.  Incidentally, I was on pain meds for another six months after the surgery due to rehab and recovery.  I was prescribed pain meds for over a year which almost led to a whole host of other problems, but that could be fodder for another post. 

Imagine this kind of system servicing over 300 million people.  All governed by bureaucrats.  Those bureaucrats deciding what you can get, when you can get it, or if they are even going to bother with your case.  Then re-read the WaPo article extolling how rationing will be just fine and dandy.

When the government is in control of your 'needs', they become secondary to the needs of the government.

(H/T:  Gateway Pundit for the videos.  Hot Air for the post title)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hockey Stick" climate graph proven false

First, the original graph:
 
 
This is the famous graph, used by many climate alarmists like Al Gore and James Hansen to prove their viewpoint that mankind is responsible for 'climate change'.  From Wikipedia:  The MBH98 reconstruction was prominently featured in the 2001 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR) and as a result has been widely published in the media.  Alarmists the world over used this data to further their cause and scare the hell out of the public.  There have always been issues about this graph from those not ready to simply surrender the debate.  Due to some of those issues, it was removed from the subsequent UN IPCC 4th Assessment Report, but it contnues to linger and the 'damage' as they say had already been done.
 
Now, look at this graph:
 
 
If I'm reading this right, the 'red' plot-line is the original data showing the huge warming trend.  The 'black' plot-line is the data set using a complete set of non-cherry picked data for tree rings.  The 'green' plot-line is where the points would diverge for an 'average' should non-cherry picked data sets be used.  Amazingly, the huge temperature spike hailed as proof of man-made warming disappears.
 
The graph above shows what happens to the “Hockey Stick” after additional tree ring data, recently released (after a long and protracted fight over data access) is added to the analysis of Hadley’s archived tree ring data in Yamal, Russia.
 
All of the sudden, it isn’t the “hottest period in 2000 years” anymore.
 
Basically, Micheal E. Mann cherry picked from a very select set of data points to "prove" his pre-conceived notion of 'climate change'.
 
This is a huge deal, not only for the scientific method, but to put to rest "the debate is over", "the science is settled" meme from people like Mann and Al Gore.
 
By definition, science is never "settled".  If it were, mankind would never have progressed past the campfire and pointy stick.
 
With this kind of revelation, one wonders how these people still hae any credibility on this subject and why, oh why isn't the media heralding this.  When the hockey stick was released, it was all over the place.  Now that it's proven to be a cherry-picked phony, *crickets*.
 
For a full breakdown, go here and here.
 
(H/T: AoS)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Law & Order" Jumps Shark: Prosecute Bush

Ever watch the NBC show "Law & Order"?  I've watched it, but my wife watches it more than I.  After watching this clip, I told my wife yesterday this show will no longer air in our home:



"It's about time someone" prosecuted Bush and his officials for 'torture' of terrorists.

This wasn't a bad show.  I could never really get past just how unreal the cops were portrayed though.  I was a cop and though some cops do maintain liberal attitudes, most are as conservative as could be.  The cops in L&O are portrayed as dyed in the wool libs, through and through.  The attorneys are all, without question, portrayed as liberal as the day is long as well.

I can forgive a certain amount of politics intruding into the plot of a show if it's at least disguised.  This kind of overt demagoguery and activism from a TV show just goes over the top.  It also illustrates the over the top nature of the liberal/leftist politics of the network itself.

NBC has let its biases ruin everything it touches.  They've ruined football just by allowing Keith Olberdouche be a commenter on their pre-game and half-time shows.  Law & Order has now gone to the dark side.  Shows like 30 Rock are packed with left-tards.  MSNBC, an NBC offshoot,  gave up any pretense at unbiased 'news' last year covering Obama in the presidential campaign.  Saturday Night Live, though they've made a habit of lampooning every president since Gerald Ford, won't go near Obama with a ten-meter cattle prod

NBC has gone down hill and crashed squarely in the toilet that is Leftism.

(H/T: Gateway Pundit via Story Balloon)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama not intrested in "Victory"

When dealing with Iran.  Video:



Question:  What if the "solution to the problem" with Iran is 'victory'?

This belies a fundamental problem with Obama's foreign policy philosophy:

President Obama said: “No nation can or should try to dominate another nation.”

Pardon me? Did a professional speechwriter write that? Or did you outsource it to a starry-eyed runner-up in the Miss America pageant? Whether or not any nation “should try” to dominate another, they certainly “can,” and do so with effortless ease, all over the planet and throughout human history.

 And how about this passage?

 “I have been in office for just nine months — though some days it seems a lot longer. I am well aware of the expectations that accompany my presidency around the world. These expectations are not about me. Rather, they are rooted, I believe, in a discontent with a status quo that has allowed us to be increasingly defined by our differences . . . ”

Forget the first part: That’s just his usual narcissistic “But enough about me, let’s talk about what the world thinks of me” shtick. But the second is dangerous in its cowardly evasiveness: For better or worse, we are defined by our differences — and, if Barack Obama doesn’t understand that when he’s at the podium addressing a room filled with representatives of Iran, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Venezuela, and other unlovely polities, the TV audience certainly did when Colonel Qaddafi took to the podium immediately afterwards. They’re both heads of state of sovereign nations. But, if you’re on an Indian Ocean island when the next tsunami hits, try calling Libya instead of the United States and sees where it gets you.


Darn right.

This philosophy is rampant on the Left.  Its the same philosophy that encourages schools to give all kids trophies for playing a 'good game'.  The concept that 'victory' is now a dirty word permeates Obama's foreign policy.  Ironically, it is tossed about his domestic agenda with abandon.  Obama and his acolytes take every opportunity to bash opposition to his policies with the "I won" mantra.

When it comes to ramming health care 'reform', cap and trade (tax), economic stimulus and industry nationalization down the throats of the American citizenry, 'victory' is an imperative. 

When it comes to keeping the most destructive weapons ever devised by man out of the hands of insane, radical  Islamist dictators, 'victory' is defined by continuing to let these nutjobs cornhole the world.

Brilliant.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Britain Under Seige!

Seems the Muslims aren't the only ones vying for control of the old country:

Britain is at risk from being overrun by ferocious "supercats", as domestic moggies interbreed with fierce wildcats increasingly being imported by extreme pet owners.

They survived the Blitz for this?

(H/T: AoS Headlines)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Dear Leader, er, Obama kids song

No, not the one you've probably already seen.  This is a different one:



The poster of the video, apparently these kids teacher, is proud of this.  He boasts that he and the kids spent many an afternoon "brainstorming" lyrics for the song.  Let's have some perspective shall we?  These are third graders, eight or nine years old.  Something tells me that these nine year olds didn't come up with these lyrics:
 
We are a nation of a thousand colors, look at me
Our strength is our diversity
Walking hand in hand we sing
Each a day a little closer to the dream of Dr. King


I'm not saying it's impossible.  But would an eight or nine year old really come up with a line like "Our strength is our diversity"?  Do eight or nine year have the capacity to integrate the teachings of Martin Luther King Jr. into the proper context of this song?  Really?  Again, I'm not saying it's impossible, but so nearly improbable as to strain credulity.

Another thing that struck me.  Take a look at the make-up of this group, every ethnic group and gender in proper proportions, almost as if it were designed that way.  And the arts and crafts of the kids - the crayon pictures of "Yes We Can!"  Did you notice the one picture the little girl was holding up?  It said "Jobs, Equal Pay, Peace".  Because a nine year old would think of those three things to put on a craft project, all by herself, I'm sure with absolutely no input from her teacher.  This project was simply thrown together in the waning moments of the school day?  Again, REALLY?

I posted the other day about the video you've probably already seen or heard about (see my post here).  This is a different school district I'm assuming, different teacher, than the previous video but there is a common thread.  Both are trying to pass this off as some sort of Black History Month celebration.  With this video, I'm more inclined to believe that since there is reference to MLK.  But the song is about President Obama and the teacher specifically states the project "morphed" from a tribute solely to Obama. 

Starting to notice a trend here and it isn't comforting. 




(At least this video didn't take place at a public school...)

But this one was...


It is quite disturbing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racist TEA Partiers riot in Pittsburgh

Oh, right. It's not the tea partiers, but violent leftists throwing stones at cars and barricading streets, which is why no one is talking about it.

Be sure to follow the link to see pictures of the Left's idea of 'peaceful protest.'

Stolen entirely from Ace of Spades.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New wave of Terror?

While we're all distracted with Obama selling us out at the UN, the jihadis seem to be scoping out new terror attacks and actually comitting acts intended as attacks.

FBI arrests Jordanian for downtown Dallas bomb plot...
Illinois man charged in plot to bomb federal offices...
Terror suspects accused of targeting Marine base in Quantico...
Men vanish after taking photos of Philly subway system...
Zazi Indicted For Conspiring To Detonate WMD...

Bomb plot in Springfield.
Denver terror bust.

New York City, Denver, Dallas, Springfield, Quantico, Philadelphia (unknown as of yet).

Cities all over America are being targeted by jihadis.  Taken separately, these would be mere 'inconveniences' I suppose, but NO ONE has thought about all of these taken together?  Certainly someone notices this?  There may not be specific connections between all of these incidents, but all of these, coordinated around roughly the same time - and this isn't news?!


OK, maybe the Springfield event was a "homegrown jihadi", perhaps not related to the other incidents, but it is damn peculiar.  I just wrote that last part of the sentence and thought of Star Trek II - The Wrath of Khan.  Remember the part where the Enterprise and the Reliant are first approaching each other in space?  Remember Lt. Saavik telling Kirk that he needed to raise the shields since they hadn't established communication with the Reliant yet?  Remember what Kirk did?  Against his better judgement, his gut, he only called a Yellow Alert.  And then WHAMMO!  Khan kicked the crap out of the Enterprise in a complete surprise attack!



Stay vigilant America.  More info at The Jawa Report

Thanks to Drudge for the links.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Glenn Beck, gettin on my nerves a bit

The Democrat Party is corrupt.

The Republican Party is corrupt.

You can't keep voting for the same thing since it just perpetuates the corruption inherent in the parties and a third party isn't the answer either. 

So far, so good.

The system is broke/corrupt, needs to be fixed, we need to vote for people of principle, we need to work with those who are there to make them accountable, but not vote within the system since it's corrupt so as to fix the system which is corrupt by not voting for the parties which are corrupt though we need to fix/change them since they are corrupt and do all of this ourselves since we can't vote within the corrupt system or try to fix/change it from the outside by way of a third party since that won't work either.

What?

I just heard Glenn tell a guy on the radio these very things.  It is not a direct quote, but the essence of his message is that very thing.  The parties are corrupt and you can't keep voting for the same thing since it isn't changing anything.  When asked "What should we do?", Glenn says he isn't about advocating for a third party.  So the caller is left confused as hell.

Now I just heard Glenn tell us that the way to fix things is to re-found it with the people we already have in.  Ostensibly, to root out the corruption that is there and hold those in place accountable.  How does that jive with what he just told this caller that we can't keep up with the same ol, same ol?

It is frustrating.  I like Glenn Beck.  I love his radio show - it's funny, entertaining, informative.  His TV show is OK, but he just seems too gimmicky at times and his segments don't work out sometimes.  It's a decent show, but I like the radio show better. 

I like what Beck says, but this schtick is getting a bit trying.  A guy called up trying to get clarification on what Beck was saying and he just  got blown off and made fun of.  Well, not blown off, but that was the result.  The caller was trying to ask how we change the Republicans if we abandon the party.  Glenn kept coming back by saying "How many times are you going to vote Republican getting the same results?"  The caller did admit to voting for Arlen Specter a number of times, so Glenn did have a point, but so did the caller.  The fact of the matter is you can't advocate for changing the parties - either one - without voting within the parties.  Of course you should have good candidates and work to make sure the party puts forth principled ones, which I think is the general point, but then Beck says stuff like you can't vote for either party anymore since they're both corrupt.

To further compound the confusion, Glenn openly states he isn't advocating for a third party and says a third party isn't the answer.  He's right.  A third party is a waste of time.  Anyone who disagree with me, and there are tons, two words - Ross Perot.  I rest my case on third parties.

Now he's saying the same thing:  It's up to us, not the Parties.  Well, forgive me but don't we have to work within the Party framework?  Glenn would counter that that is just more of the same.  I get what he's saying and agree with it generally, but you can't say it's up to us and then tell us we can't work within the system, the parties or a third party.  Then how are we to get anything done?  You're just spinning your wheels.

Listen, I understand we need to get rid of corruption and hold politicians accountable.  I understand about voting for whoever, from either party as long as they are principled.  I've voted for Democrats (back home, locally) for that very reason.  But there is something in his message that just doesn't sit right with me.  Maybe it's me?  Maybe Glenn just isn't stating his case clearly?  I'm not one for nuance.  If you want to get a message through, tell me straight.

In my eyes, to fix things we need to work within the system we have.  Yes it's corrupt.  But the only way to fix things is to fix them from the inside.  I don't agree with Democrats.  I don't agree with some Republicans.  But we have the system we have.  We can root out corruption, vote in principled politicians but to do these things we have to have somewhere to start.  Glenn would say, start with the Constitution.  Of course, but then what? 

Glenn offers great suggestions, but offers no real way to implement them IMHO.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »