About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Super-Duper Climate Polluter, er...Computer

What uses enough energy to power 1,000 homes and blows over 14,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere?

Britain's newest computer for predicting the weather.  It is supposed to help predict how climate change will affect Britain.  I wonder if its programmers have input the computers own carbon footprint into their equations?

It also cost 33 million British pounds (over 53 million US dollars).  For that kind of money, you would hope the computer would be the best predictor of global climate change catastrophe.

Not so much.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Lion, Soviet Stooge

Man, this guy really got around:

Kennedy's message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.

Womanizer.  Liar.  Murderer.  Hyper-partisan liberal.  Amoral.  Drunk. 

Soviet stooge.

Yep, 'ol Teddy sure was a paragon of Leftism/Liberalism.  Pols of Teddy's character are rarely found outside of third-world crapholes and military juntas.

Read the whole article.

*Post title shamelessly stolen from Ace*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kennedy, A Cad

My two cents on the death of Senator Kennedy.

The man was a Cad of the First Order.  What is a cad?  See definition.  Of course I'm going a bit "old school" throwing out a word like cad, but wasn't Kennedy from another era of politics?  We've all seen the accolades for the past few days.  Some of us have been sickened by the over-the-top ravings from every level of Liberalism about how good 'ol Ted was a "lion", a "foil to conservatives", a hero to the under-privileged and the working man.  PUHleeease!

Kennedy was a hyper-partisan, just ask Robert Bork.  He was a womanizer .  I'm being excessively kind here.  In the world of Liberals a 'womanizer' is really someone guilty of sexual assault.  The man has no specific achievements outside politics (nor any real achievements inside politics for that matter) which anyone can point to and say "Look what Teddy did."  He was a creature of privilege and rode the coattails of his brothers successes (and assassinations) to political office.  Let's be frank, no one ever took a shot at 'ol Ted because he simply wasn't worth it.  Am I being crass?  You bet.  No more crass than good 'ol Ted using the death of a woman he killed as a punchline for the past forty years.

Ted Kennedy is dead and we are left with the fawning, retch-inducing pap from the Left about how his life was oh-so-great.  Oh yes, the Left are in particular rare form with their praise of 'ol Ted.  And what would any praise of such a liberal "lion" be without some ridiculousness about the "right-wing"?  The "Right-Wing" has been blamed for the assassinations of his brothers John and Robert (obviously true since Lee Harvey Oswald was never an avowed Communist/Marxist  In fact, Sirhan-Sirhan was such a right winger that Obama babysitter Bill Ayers dedicated his Marxist screed "Prairie Fire" to Sirhan.  If that isn't an endorsement of Sirhans 'rightness' I don't know what is...)

Perhaps you've heard that Mary Jo Kopechne would have thought good 'ol Ted's career and life was worth all the fuss after all?  Yes.  A Libtard is actually saying that the murdered Miss Kopechne (murdered by Kennedy btw) would be just fine, nay, ecstatic about how Ted lived his life for Liberalsim.  Yet I would be called heartless by any liberal who might read this?

How about the comparison with Ted Kennedy's death and 9/11?  But conservatives are out of touch...

Ted Kennedy was and is not worth the praise he is receiving.  He did nothing with his life.  He killed a woman and turned it into a almost 50 year career  in the Senate.  He assaulted and denigrated woman yet is held up as a paragon by feminists (not unlike Bill Clinton).  He used hyper-partisan hyperbole to ruin (or nearly ruin) a man's life (see Bork).  He even used the circumstances of his illness to further his ideological cause of "health-care reform" and to promote the changing of state law to keep Liberalism entrenched in Massachusetts.  Even his death is being used by the Left as a tool to try to ram through health care legislation.  These are just some of the examples of his partisanship and *ahem* amorality.  Why is he being praised again?

More here, here, and here.

Edward M. Kennedy, rest in some fashion somewhere.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rifftrax - funny, funny stuff

Did you ever watch Mystery Science Theater 3000 (MST3K)?  If you didn't, you missed out.  (Follow the link for explanation of the series if you are unaware of it's complete awesomeness!)

As it happens, the MST3K writers and performers have not stopped their riffing on films.  Now the enterprise is a web-based site called Rifftrax.  The Rifftrax crew riff on more popular and classic films which you can purchase from the site.  (follow the site link for a sample)

They also do live broadcast events nationwide from time to time.  There was just such a broadcast last Thursday, where the Rifftrax crew riffed on the "worst movie ever made"  "Plan 9 from Outer Space".  Plan 9 is, probably, the worst movie I have ever seen, having watched it some years ago as a kid.  This time around, it was accompanied by riffing from the (former) MST3K group.  I took my three kids to this event at the Fiesta 16 theater here in San Antonio.

I can honestly  say I haven't laughed for such a protracted period of time in years!  The experience was awesome!  I can also say I have found a new favorite theater in the Fiesta 16.  My kids enjoyed the event as well.  I tried to tell them about Plan 9, about how bad it was, but they didn't believe me, especially my son.  Let's just say dad's credibility in 'reviewing' films received a shot in the arm after last Thursday.

If you enjoy this kind of stuff, if you enjoyed the original MST3K, if you want to spend two or more hours at these events laughing your head off, check out any future Rifftrax events which may occur in your area (be sure to follow the link above!)

More samples (and full movies, in parts) available at this You Tube MST3K channel

Note:  These Rifftrax events are live broadcast.  They are attended by audiences which are pretty much expected to participate during some points.  These are not traditional "please be quiet" movies.  Have fun with it and enjoy yourself!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama desecrates 9/11

Signs legislation turning September 11th into a National Day of Service:

The Obama White House is behind a cynical, coldly calculated political effort to erase the meaning of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks from the American psyche and convert Sept. 11 into a day of leftist celebration and statist idolatry.

This effort to reshape the American psyche has nothing to do with healing the nation and everything to do with easing the nation along in the ongoing radical transformation of America that President Obama promised during last year's election campaign. The president signed into law a measure in April that designated Sept. 11 as a National Day of Service, but it's not likely many lawmakers thought this meant that day was going to be turned into a celebration of ethanol, carbon emission controls, and radical community organizing.

On the Aug. 11 call, Yearwood and other leaders kept saying repeatedly that they wanted 9/11 to be used for something "positive," "forward-leaning," and "productive," said a source with knowledge of the teleconference.

The plan is to turn a "day of fear" that helps Republicans into a day of activism called the National Day of Service that helps the left. In other words, nihilistic liberals are planning to drain 9/11 of all meaning.


Can you believe that?  If I had my druthers, 9/11 would be a National Day of Vengeance, but that's why I'm not in charge.

Nothing at all is sacred to these people.

More here and here.

(H/T: AoS)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Movie Review - "Inglorious Basterds"

Believe it or not, I liked this movie.

I have gotten a bit tired of the Quentin Tarentino schtick over the last few years.  Resevoir Dogs was good, and Pulp Fiction wasn't a terrible movie but his stuff just seemed to get a bit "tired" if you catch my meaning.  Most of his stuff just seemed a bit too tongue in cheek, a bit too over the top, a bit too much of an "homage" to whatever past film genre, so I was expecting kinda the same thing with this movie.

The plot centers around a group of jewish allied soldiers, a special unit, put together by Brad Pitt.  Their job is to operate as a guerrilla unit behind enemy lines "killing Naatzis".  Ultimately they get intel about a special movie premier to be attended by Hitler himself and the German High Command.   A parrallel plot revolves around a German SS officer, the "Jew Hunter" and an escaped victim of the SS officer from earlier in the film and her own idea about dealing with the Nazis.

In the first part of the movie, I figured "here we go" with the same kinda Tarentino stuff.  There is a part where you get a blast of spaghetti western type music.  At first, it seems completely out of place, but as the scene progresses you see why it's in there and ultimately does work.  The whole movie is that way for a bit.  It isn't your standard "war movie" fare.  It is NOT historically accurate.  It isn't as "uber" violent overall as one would think a Tarentino film would be, though there are a few graphic scenes.  There are no Kill Bill type scenes of blood spraying tens of feet into the air (if you've seen the first Kill Bill movie you know what I'm talking about).  There are bits of "quirkyness" thrown in the film from time to time and you need to be quick to spot them.  I won't reveal what they are, but they are funny.

The movie is long, but it doesn't seem long.  There was one point in the movie where I was wondering when we were going to get to the point, but it passed quickly.  I know that sounds like a contradiction, but what are you going to do - I'm not a professional movie reviewer.  I didn't realize what time it was until I got in my car to drive home and was a bit surprised at the length, over two and a half hours. 

The movie has humor, in just the right spots.  It has two scenes in particular where the tension is palpable - you know something bad is going to happen, but the scene keeps you engaged until the climax and you realize you were sitting on the edge of your seat (figuratively speaking).   Most of the movie is predictable in the fact you know something is going to happen in the key scenes, but you are kept guessing as to what will happen, if that makes any sense.  There are some genuine surprises too, but we'll keep them that way.

This movie harkens back to Tarentino's earlier works, which is good.  The movie doesn't take itself too seriously, another hallmark of Tarentino, but in this instance it works.  It was a good (though quirky at times), entertaining movie.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thoughts on "Astroturf"

Having spent most of the last three weeks at the Alamodome watching the Dallas Cowboys Training Camp, and having spent one of those days on the sidelines watching the practice, I understand what astroturf really is.  I understand the political definition of "astroturf" - something false, fake, artificial.  I get it.  I don't think it fits into those particular parameters though in relation to the townhall protests across the country.

The Democrats and the Left would have you believe these protests are filled with "plants" (as if the President himself doesn't populate his own townhalls with that very thing).  Those who are attending these townhalls, average citizens, are somehow following a script or are being driven by some higher "force", like Rush Limbaugh (which I find a bit amusing: the Left scoffs at the "messianicness" the right has bestowed upon Barack Obama, in no small part due to his sychophantic supporters, yet can't wait to bestow those same messianic qualities - upon a talk show host).  This of course is the playbook of the Left: simply denigrate the opposition, don't address their concerns, move along.  It has backfired predictably, but the "astroturf" label persists.

The label isn't appropos for many reasons.  Have you ever been on a field of real astroturf?  It is soft, yielding, kinda squishy and to a point, kinda pliable.  Do those attending the townhall meetings across the country seem to fit any of those characteristics?  Astroturf is "fake" in the fact it isn't real grass, but in many ways it is better than the real thing.  It doesn't require water, fertilizer, and needs only minimal care   It is durable, water and weatherproof and last a long time.  Those attending the protests aren't fake.  Their concerns aren't artificial.  If anything, the protesters are indeed like true astroturf - resilient, durable and require little care.  The exact polar opposite of the type of person who supports the Left and liberal Democrats in particular. 

The only thing fake and artificial in all these discussions of townhalls and in all the denigration of those attending are the Democrats themselves and the health care "plan" they are attempting to foist on us all..
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the event of Zombie Apocalypse...

We're screwed.

Unless we hit back hard and fast.  With liberals in charge of everything?

We're totally screwed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Unproven" defense system proven...again

President Obama pledged to "cut investments in unproven missile defense systems".

They didn't get the memo:  (be sure to follow the link for a full debunking of critical assertions)

"...this remarkably operationally realistic THAAD test goes a long way in defanging missile defense skeptics. Combine it with other BMD test successes and it becomes extremely difficult for critics to utilize the stale, knee-jerk arguments they've lazily relied on for the past 20 years."

More proof of the "unproven" technology here.  And here.  And here.  There have been 19 successful tests of the system (out of twenty three attempts) since 2002, an over 82% success rate - on an "unproven" system.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Movie Review - District 9

Spoiler Alert!

District 9 is a science fiction movie.  It centers around an alien ship which comes to rest over Johannesburg, South Africa in the early 1980's.  There is no communication from the obvious alien inhabitants.  The ship just hovers in mid-air for weeks.  Finally, the government of South Africa takes action and cuts its way into the ship.  What they find are over one million alien inhabitants - malnourished and in an unhealthy condition.

After the discovery of the aliens and the acknowledgment that they are obviously non-hostile, a multi-national organization, the MNU (patterned after a UN organization) is formed to deal with the aliens.  They are ferried from the 'mothership' and set up in refugee camps which quickly turn into slums.  Over time, the aliens become fodder for opportunistic criminal African gangs and the South African government attempts to exploit alien technology (primarily weapons), but can't make it work.  It is later revealed that the South African government has been using members of the alien race in biological experiments.

Eventually, the residents of Johannesburg (black and white) come to resent the alien (derogatorily termed "Prawns" for their resemblance to shrimp) presence.  The MNU decides to forcibly evict the aliens from the slum and move them to another camp.  A MNU worker, Wikus van der Merwe, is put in charge of the operation.  He is a genteel fellow, not particularly bright, but a hard worker and a believer that what he and the MNU are doing is the right thing.

While clearing the slum, Wikus is accidentally sprayed with an alien "fluid" (later revealed to be some sort of fuel for the alien spacecraft) and begins suffering a metamorphosis into an alien himself.  Not knowing the danger of what just occurred, Wikus confiscates the tube containing the 'fluid' and goes about his duties.  At first, he has no idea he is changing.  While later clearing the slum, he is injured by an angry alien and his left arm is hurt.  It is treated on the scene by medics, wrapped in a bandage and forgotten about.  Unbeknownst to him, below the bandage, his left arms turns into an alien appendage.

Upon discovery of this at the hospital, the government takes forcible control over Wikus.  Upon experimentation, it is discovered that Wikus can manipulate alien weaponry (which is DNA coded for aliens only).  Wikus is made to fire all manner of weaponry at various targets.  In a particularly disturbing scene, he is forced to fire a high-energy weapon at a frightened alien, murdering it.  After all manner of tests, it is decided that Wikus must be vivesected to further study his metamorphosis.  What makes this more disturbing to the viewer, is that Wikus's humanity isn't even a concern to the officials making the decisions.  In fact, his own father-in-law (who is a high ranking MNU official) approves the procedure, ignoring Wiku's pleas for help.

Wikus inevitably escapes captivity in the only place he can - the alien slum.  He coincidentally seeks refuge in the shack where he was sprayed by the fluid, the shack of the alien 'Christopher'.  Christopher discovers what has happened to Wikus and explains to Wikus why he is changing.  Christopher explains he can change Wikus back, if they can get aboard the mothership.  To do that, they need the 'fluid'.  Both of them hatch a rather inconceivable plan to re-enter the "heavily fortified" MNU headquarters to recover the vial with the alien 'fluid'.  They successfully breach the facility and recover the fluid.  During their sojourn into MNU HQ, Christopher also discovers his people have been the subject of experimentation, which upsets him greatly.

Wikus and Christopher make their way back to the slum, back into Christopher's shack (which is hiding the buried "control craft" for the alien mothership) and attempt to get to the mothership.  The MNU launches a military force to attempt to re-capture Wikus, shooting down the 'control craft'.  Gun battle ensues which brings into the fray the African gangs controlling the slums who fight the MNU forces to capture Wikus themselves.  The leader of the African gang believes that if he eats Wikus's transformed arm, he himself will be embued with alien power and be able to operate alien weaponry.

After a battle in which Wikus makes his way into an alien "Mech" suit, Wikus covers for Christopher as he and his son manipulate the mothership and return to it.  Christopher vows to return to Wikus to help him (repaying Wikus for his help) but that it will be three years (the travel time to and from Christopher's homeworld).

The movie ends on a semi-cliffhanger note.  Wickus is saved from death by aliens who kill the leader of the MNU forces who was about to murder Wikus.  Wikus's wife discovers a 'flower' on her doorstep at some time after the incidents, thinking perhaps it was placed there by Wikus.  The last shot of the movie shows an alien forming such a flower.  Is it a fully transformed Wikus?  The movie also ends leaving the questions:  Where is Wikus?  Will Christopher return someday with a force to liberate his alien brethren and declare war on humanity?  What will be the fate of the now 2.5 million aliens that now reside in District 10?

District 9 has an element of 'social commentary'.  The issue of apartheid is touched on, but only briefly.  One could make the stretch in equivocation to the resettlement of Palestinians, but this is not inferred explicitly or implicitly in the film.  The parallels of race are dealt with fairly I think.  Both the white and black residents of Johannesburg look down on the aliens, thinking of them as less than human if you will pardon the pun.

There is an element of man's inhumanity when it comes to the aliens.  The segregation, the experiments, murder, abuse, exploitation.  The white controlled South African government is no less hostile to the aliens than the black African gangs who exploit the aliens at every turn.  Mankinds 'evil' (at least in Johnannesburg, South Africa) is not determined by the color of his skin.

Think of this movie as "Alien Nation" if the mothership in that movie had landed anywhere but the United States.  In Alien Nation, the aliens were ultimately assimilated into American culture.  In District 9, they are completely segregated outcasts, deemed unworthy.

The movie is shot in part "documentary style".  The transition from this style to conventional movie isn't even noticed due to how the movie and characterization seems to draw you in.  The effects are good.  The interaction between live action and CGI is almost flawless, which is impressive in and of itself. 

District 9 is a movie that uses the social commentary of apartheid, racism, segregation, etc as a plot element rather than trying to beat the audience over the head with a grander political point.  I think it works.  Of the five of us in the family who saw it last night, only the Vice-Commander didn't like it.  She's not that much into science fiction anyway. 

I was pleasantly surprised with the movie District 9.

Note:  If you aren't into dolling out the sheckles to see this at the movies, it will be a great popcorn movie to rent when it's released on video.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Democrat Tactic for Townhalls

Don't have any.

If there is a meeting, change the name. Call them "roundtables".  If you have a "roundtable", stack the deck with health care "supporters" (read OfA) and make the discussion by "invitation only".  If that doesn't work, then have a meeting but send out the general notification at the last minute, knowing fewer people will show up.  Also, be sure to send out staffers to answer questions by not answering questions.  (Interesting note on the 'staffer' issue from Ed Morrissey:  No one elected this staffer.  They elected the Senator and the Senator has a responsibility, a duty, to answer to his constituents) 

This is an interesting video from the Sherrod event depicting the cowardly nature and pure bullshinola from some Organizing for America 'volunteers'.  They are deliberately evasive.  When pressed, they refuse to answer questions.  When one of their members answers questions, then they demand to know the affiliation of the questioner.  I don't know if the girl's story about her friend with skin cancer is true (and to her credit, she was open and honest and cheerful in her willingness to answer questions), but color me skeptical.  BOTH of this 'victims' parents make six figures, yet can't seem to find the money to pay FOR THEIR OWN DAUGHTERS CANCER TREATMENT?!  Really?  Ummm...bull. 

Democrats are employing this tactic in Ohio, New Hampshire, and Colorado.  It backfired in Colorado however.  When Colorado constituents found out their representative wasn't going to have a meeting, they decided to schedule one themselves, and invite the in absentia congresswoman.  Guess what happened within hours?  The Colorado Rep suddenly released a schedule of townhalls!  Huzzah!!

I have e-mailed my own representative, Ciro Rodriguez (D) to ask about any townhalls he may have.  He hasn't had any yet, though he did have a kind of impromptu meeting in front of a Starbucks last week.  He also had a tele-conference on VA health issues on July 31.  He has yet to schedule any full scale constituent meetings however.  There is nothing on his website.  There is a rumor of a meeting scheduled for August 29th, but there is no mention of it on his website.  There is also rumor the meeting, if it was scheduled, may be cancelled.  I am awaiting a response.

It would seem this is a coordinated effort, at least by some, to avoid dealing with their constituents and hence, the problem.  I can only hope the electorate and the opponents of these politicians remember this treatment when the next election cycle rolls around.

UPDATE:  Links fixed.  Sorry 'bout dat...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fairness, thy name is "Diversity"

“Local public broadcasters and regional and national communications operations should be required to encourage and broadcast diverse views and programs,” wrote Lloyd. “These programs should include coverage of all local, state and federal government meetings, as well as daily news and public issues programming.

If there is going to be a requirement to broadcast "diverse views", then why add the hyperbole of "encouragement"?  "We encourage you to do X, but you'll be required to do it anyway."  Huh?

The report argued that large corporate broadcasting networks had driven liberals off the radio, and that diversity of ownership would increase diversity of broadcasting voices.

This has been tried, at least from a "private ownership" perspective.  Remember Air America?  It went bankrupt.  The libs and lefties would have you believe that there simply wasn't enough money to keep things going.  Nuh-uh.  Air America couldn't attract listeners becasue their programs were horrible.  The on-air "personalities", like such talents as Al Franken and Janeane Gerafalo, drove people away with their negativity and leftist ideology.  Rush Limbaugh has been on the air nationally for over 20 years.  He has never had to suffer through not getting or attracting advertising dollars.  His program has been successful every single year it has been on the radio.  Air America folks lasted, what, three years?  And they only had their head above water for the first year?

This is a fallacy.  "If only" we had more money.  "If only" we had "diversity".  "If only" someone else would pay for it. 

"Liberal" radio has failed everywhere it has been tried.  The only reason outlets such as NPR and PBS are still in business is because they get government subsidies.  In a liberals mind, this is how the world should work.  Let the government fund it and it will be alright.  I have to listen to a few minutes of commercials on the radio when I listen to programs such as Rush.  Advertisers telling me how good their products are and encouraging me to buy their stuff or at least give it a try - no guilt, no shame.  Whenever I watch PBS (which isn't very often), I have to suffer through 15 minutes of begging from on-air guilt mongers (that's 15 minutes every half hour - at least it seems that way) extolling the benefits of PBS while trying to convince me that $150 dollar DVD is worth it to support such "excellent programming".  Diversity?

This is the new code for the "Fairness Doctrine".  It's a sight worse actually.  Under this tactic, the proponents want to force private companies to fund their operations, and then the proponents will be the arbiters of the types of programming which will be provided.  Does anyone really think that if this were to happen, programs such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck would have the same freedom of operation and time allotted each week they do now?  Eventually they would be forced from the air completely, for the sake of diversity?  "How can we possibly give Rush 15 hours a week?  We need that time for programming about the snail darter or Congolese field mouse.  Why, we have 15 different shows about making cheese we need to broadcast.  There is just too much out there  to give Rush so much time.  It wouldn't foster 'diversity'"

Chief Diversity Officer of the FCC?  Another Czar?  Yet another unelected suit attempting to foist his views through fiat.

Beware the man behind the curtain...

(H/T: Hot Air Greenroom post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ruthless Pragmatism

The guy not sure about treating his own grandma is going to be the one decid[ing] on care for your loved ones. No worries.

Follow the link and read the article. 

Another thing which struck me as I read the article.  Obama said he didn't know how much his grandmothers hip replacement cost, but that he would have paid for it out of pocket, since she was his grandma.  Even though his grandmother passed away before she got any real benefit from the surgery, why didn't Obama pay for it anyway?  He said he would have.  Why didn't he?

Asking follow-up questions in an interview must be harder than I thought...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Musings

What's with the Sci-Fi channel changing it's name to SyFy?  "Imagine Greater" is the new tagline for the channel.  After more than a month of watching the newly "revamped" channel, I'm not impressed with the name change.  Ostensibly, those making the name change say they did so to appeal to a larger advertising market and to make them seem less "dorky".  What?  Since when has sci-fi (science fiction) ever been "dorky"?

Early science fiction writers (even before the advent of the term 'science fiction') like Jules Verne and H. G. Wells inspired and continue to inspire modern day scientists, physicists, theorists, futurists, etc to expand our knowledge of the universe.  Verne's novel From the Earth to the Moon was directly referenced by NASA scientists and is still referenced by astronauts as immeasurably impacting the space race and our ultimately making it to the Moon in 1969.  Wells (notwithstanding his socio-political bent) intrigued and terrified people with his visions of the future and technology.  Dorky?

Have you read much 19th century literature?  Have you read Jane Austen?  Any of the Bronte's works?  Booooring.  Dickens, Stevenson and others like Dumas are pretty good (depending on the novel) but it's all about classism, sociology, politics (sometimes wrapped in satire, Twain for example).  If you read any of this literature now, most all of it is dated and tired.  Verne and Wells still seem somehow fresh, if the literary style is itself a bit dated.  But I digress from my main musing...

SyFy, for all it's supposed revamping, is still the same stuff.  Their "original" movies almost inclusively stink.  There is the occasional OK movie but it's still the same fare the channel has pretty much always offered.  Their one real saving grace is the series programming.  Shows like Eureka and Warehouse 13 are decent, though definitely not top shelf programming.  The channels one bright star was Battlestar Galatica.  The show was ruined in season three though with metaphors to the supposed pointlessness of the Iraq war and occupation, amongst other things, not to mention the horrid ending to the series.  Here's a personal hint to the SyFy channel:  simply adding the word "dragon" to the title of a movie and recycling B and C grade actors from early and mid 1980's fantasy movies does not a decent program make. 

Changing the name from Sci-Fi to SyFy shows how little you really understand about the entire premise of the channel to begin with.

Since we're talking about television, what's with the Weather Channel?  It seems that anytime I turn on the weather channel to get the weather, I'm treated to some sort of weather "reality" show or docu-drama type program.  "Full Force Nature"?  "Storm Stories"?  Really

And forgive me for saying this, but Jim Cantore (who I like as a "weatherman") is not a superhero.  Nor is he some valiant crusader against evil weather conditions or whatever.  Have you seen the segments showing this guy and hailing him as a "Stormchaser"?  Again, with all due respect to Mr. Cantore, he is a meteorologist, not a valiant hero for taking video of tornados.  Let's tone the 'drama' down just a tad, please.

I watch the weather channel to get up-to-date, sometimes real-time weather information for where I live.  "Local on the 8's" is what I tune into the weather channel for.  Unfortunately, there have been several times when sever weather has occurred and I couldn't get a "Local on the 8's" update since the weather channel was showing me "Storm Stories" for the tenth time that day. 

Weather Channel, please stick to the weather.  Your meteorologists are not journalists, nor are they investigative reporters.  Tell me what the weather will be today and for the next several days and let me know what's going on with hurricanes from time to time.  Everything else is filler and we know it.

Side note:  I don't watch Al Roker on NBC, I don't want to watch him on the Weather Channel.  Plugging his new show every three minutes is getting really old.  The plugs aren't funny, they are annoying.  Stop it.

AMC is supposed to be "American Movie Classics".  "Out for Justice", an early 1990's Steven Segal action vehicle, is not a classic of American film, yet is being featured on AMC later today.  Stop it.

Side note:  I am glad AMC will be adapting the comic The Walking Dead as a series.  Hopefully they won't screw it up like they did The Andromeda Strain.

MTV is no longer "Music Television", I think we've known that for over a decade now.  VH1 is also no longer a channel for watching music videos either.  VH1 is supposed to stand for "Video Hits 1" and was launched to counter the fact that MTV was no longer showing music videos.  If you want to watch music videos anymore, you have to turn to "VH1 Classics" or CMT, though CMT doesn't show many videos anymore either.

SCi-Fi is now SyFy - they changed their name but kept pretty much the same programming.  MTV, VH1 and to a lesser extent CMT don't have the same programming anymore, yet haven't changed their names.  Things that make you go....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »