About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Voinovich cries like a girl

Watch the vid:
 
I know I kinda scared you with Olbermann there for a sec, sorry.
 
This guy now laments there are too many of us Southerners in the GOP?  I guess if we weren't so racist, with all our slave holdings and mint julips, and talkin 'n sich foony woayyys he'd be all for us?  You will not be missed jacka--.
 
(H/T: AoS)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rainbow Truthers

Is it light refraction?  Couldn't be.  Must be the "metal oxide salts" leeching into our "water and oxygen supply".
 
 
Could be the Juice or all that talk from Obamanoids about "rainbows" finally coming true?
 
In another episode of "Moron of the Week", I give you the "Vegatable Tree" lady:
 
 
And people wonder how Obama got elected...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's GITMO plan is FUBAR

Acronyms are cool.
 
Posted from AoS:
 
On his second day in office, the President promised that the detention facility would be closed by January 22, 2010. He was reluctant, however, to close it on his own authority. He wants Congressional cover and Congress hasn't been too helpful with that. Even Democrats, particularly in the House, oppose shutting down our primary overseas detention center and moving the detainees to the U.S.
 
To be sure, Guantanamo Bay is a military facility. The President can close it and move the detainees as part of his commander-in-chief powers (though things might get sticky if Congress passes a law saying otherwise). President Obama won't do that. He's too afraid. He will--like always--announce a policy and then vote "present", hoping all the while that someone else will do it for him.
 
More from Newsweek.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health/Wellness programs DON'T SAVE MONEY!

The Dems can't get support for their supposed health care "savings" since there aren't any.  In fact, it will cost MORE money (so says the CBO).  No one from the Left has still answered the question about how spending $1 trillion is supposed to save money, but I'm no economist so maybe I'm just not "getting it."
 
Anyway, now the Dems are trying to tell you that "health and wellness programs" will have "benefits and save money". 
 
Bullshinola.
 
When I entered the military back in 1987 there was no such thing as health and wellness.  Over the past decade though the DoD has spent millions of dollars on such programs, in fact setting up so-called "Health and Wellness Centers" at military bases worldwide.  These HAWCS are staffed with nutritionists, therapists, consultants, etc.  These centers have no real "doctors" (not medical doctors anyway).  Their mission is to give classes, provide counseling, and information for nutrition, exercise, etc.  They also give body mass index readings and other types of stuff.  Sometimes they have special exercise classes (like "spin classes"), yoga classes, etc, things you would expect to get from a fitness club staff.  They also give classes on smoking cessation, drug and alcohol awareness, etc.  Basically, it's an offshoot of "the gym".  Remember, no real doctors work at these centers.  Remember the DoD spends millions of dollars on these centers every year.  
 
Their mission is to "advise" and "instruct".  They give classes on how to eat right, but can't make you.  They give smoking cessation classes, even providing stop-smoking patches, etc.  How's that working?  The military, as a cross section of society, has more smokers on average than the general populace; I think the statistic is over 30% of active duty military folks smoke.  When a military person gets a "referral" to the HAWC it's treated as a joke - it is a joke.  HAWCs by and large are wasteful, redundant mechanisms.  So what's the point?
 
Because someone fell for the almost pseudo-science of "health and wellness" and "prevention".  On the surface this makes sense.  If you eat right there is less of a chance of getting fat and having to deal with the associated health problems which could arise.  If you don't look past the generalities, it makes sense.  The problem is I should be hearing this from my doctor, not a "fitness consultant".  In fact I do hear this from my doctor, every time I go for a checkup or physical.  So why do we have those "fitness consultants" again?  Why is the government spending twice the money for half the desired result?  That's the big elephant in the room, isn't it?
 
Personally, if a "fitness consultant" tells me to eat right it goes in one ear and out the other.  If my doctor tells me to eat right, ties that to some problem I have at the moment, or ties it to how I might develop a problem later (since my doctor knows my medical history) I will be more inclined to take his advice, not the "consultant's".
 
Let's be frank.  In this day and age if you don't know that you can't eat all manner of fatty, processed foods, drink every soda on the shelf, stuff your face with twinkies, then not get out of the chair, put the TV remote down and get some exercise, that this type of behavior is bad for you, then you deserve to be hit in the head with a tack hammer.  Or suffer that massive coronary.  Whatever.
 
If your family has a history of heart disease, then there is a better chance you might develop it and need to eat right, exercise a bit more and see your doctor, not a "consultant".  If you get sick and it doesn't get better after a week or so with over-the-counter meds, then you need to see a doctor, not a "consultant".  There's your "health and wellness" advice, free of charge.
 
Also:  "Prevention" is the term for using a bit of common sense before you do stuff so you don't hurt yourself.  In other words, if you are walking through your neighborhood and see a swimming pool full of pirahna, don't jump in.  There, you prevented your death.
 
We don't need a government bureaucracy separate from your doctor to tell you to eat right.  If you want that, pay for a fitness club membership on your own.  But that is what "health and wellness" is - it's code for spending more money, separate from your doctor, to tell you stuff you already know.  One more thing, if you don't think the government won't begin to mandate such "healthy behaviors", if you don't think that under a government health care plan not "living healthy" won't be used as justification to deny you care, your kidding yourself. 
 
"Health and wellness" is the key to unlock that particular Pandora's Box. 
 
(H/T: Hot Air)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »