About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

'American' Spirit propelled us to the Moon

I've read many articles and blog posts and watched quite a few shows over the past week about the triumph of the Apollo 11 mission and the first landing on the moon.  Something missing from most of the articles and shows is the credit to the American spirit which drove the program.  There has been much effusive prose and commentary about how this is a crowning achievement for humanity, a triumph of the human spirit, etc.  While this is technically true, is ignores a fundamental truth - Humanity didn't go to the Moon. 

The United States
did.
 
The "Space Program", indeed the entire "Space Race" was a uniquely American idea and achievement.  Yes the Soviets dabbled, their crowning achievement being orbiting a "satellite" (Sputnik) in 1957.  Yes they put some men in orbit and shot some rockets into the atmosphere.  But it took an American idea to go the next step.  The Soviets could have done the same thing we did, had they the will.  Technologically in those early days, both countries programs were pretty much identical, as were the achievements.  For all their posturing and bravado, the Soviets (now Russia) haven't done what we did, even in the intervening years since 1969.  They didn't have the will.  We did.  We won. 
 
To the detractors who would say mine is a purely egocentric, nay an Amerocentric point of view and refuses to acknowledge other facts, I would say, ours is the flag on the Moon, no one elses.
 
Notwithstanding Neil Armstrong's poignant line "...one giant leap for mankind." those weren't UN flags on the Saturn 5 rocket, the capsule, orbiter, or lunar module.  It wasn't a "flags of Nations" quilt the astronauts planted on the surface.  It was "Old Glory" - the good old red, white and blue.  'Human' spirit?  Please.
 
An American President set the goal.  American taxpayers footed the bill.  American scientists, engineers and technicians did the work, and American Astronauts flew the missions and put their lives on the line.  Not a "global village".  Not a "community of nations".  Americans.  Note:  Yes, I realize there were folks of other 'nationalities' who worked on the program.  But they did so under the auspices of American direction and in some cases as American citizens.  In today's understanding, there was nothing "international" about the space program.
 
Humanity hasn't accomplished, nor endeavored to accomplish what America did.  Other nations like Japan, India and China have only begun the first tentative steps to even begin discussing doing what we did - 40 years ago! Everything about today's anniversary should be a celebration of what makes America great - individualism, ruggedness, perseverance, determination, risk taking, you name it.  There were no commitees determining the gender of the crews.  There were no politically correct mission statements.  We went to the Moon "because it is hard". 
 
Only America, the United States, supplied what was needed to walk on another celestial body - American exceptionalism.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This man deserves to die

For what this country, the United States, has done to the Taliban:
 
 
According to numerous "non-interventionists" and other Ron Paul types as well as every Leftist anti-war loon on the planet, this man deserves to die for his "crimes".  Of course they would say me saying this is ridiculous and accuse me of being a fascist, cold-hearted SOB.  But isn't that their argument?
 
The terrorists attacked us because of our intervention in the Middle East, etc.  If it hadn't been for this countries Middle Eastern policy, the muslims and others would be completely happy to live and let live.  Private Bowe is a "war criminal", yes?  So he deserves his fate?   If you adhere to the Leftists and Paulista point of view, then this man deserves to die.  Don't give me that "the Private is innocent, simply carrying out the orders of his superiors and doesn't deserve this treatment" argument.  Do you believe the Taliban will give him due consideration for that?  Or will they murder him as another evil "Crusader"?
 
The Taliban and other radical islamists don't care for a person's politics, religion, philosophy.  They simply care that the guy is an "infidel" and therefore deserving of death.  Will the Taliban even give the guy consideration for conversion to spare his life?  They haven't yet for anyone they've kidnapped thus far.  Why?  Because it isn't about their "faith".  It's about power, control, terror and tyranny. 
 
Period.
 
Those of you who subscribe to the "Blame America First" crowd, take a good long look at this video and let this man's face burn itself into your memory.
 
I can only pray his situation resolves itself well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (25) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conspiracy Truths Revealed!

In conducting painstaking research into the truth on 9/11, Roswell, Bigfoot and the Moon Landings, I have discovered the definitive truth about what happened:
 
The 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by genetically enhanced Bigfoots (who happened to be in the vicinity of Roswell and were affected by the alien radiation).  They were on hand and remote-directed the planes into the towers themselves using their heightened ESP powers.  The energy the Bigfoot used was supplemented by the titanium plane engines they consumed which gave them the telekinetic power to collapse Tower #7, all the while the crews and passengers from the real airlines were hauled off the Bigfoot population camps to make up breeding stock to keep the North American primate mystery alive.  And the moon landings were faked by the government on agreement with the Bigfoots who are really moon men and didn't want their home world invaded by humans (American's after all!  Is there no end to our imperialistic agenda?!) which is the real reason we haven't been back to the moon in forty years. 
 
Oh, and on December 21, 2012 the world will end.  I saw a movie trailer about it which proves it.
 
And JFK was killed by the Illuminati (or was that the Bilderbergers or Bohemian Grove) because he said "caahh" instead of "car".
 
And Mchael Jackson wanted to do a remake of the "Thirller"video but the only way he could look more like a zombie than he actually did was to really kill himself, hoping that an elixir created from the bones of the elephant man would re-animate his corpse, thereby giving a more "realistic" portrayal as a zombie than the one he did in 1983.
 
And Ron Paul is a more principled politician and savior for American because he participates in the extra-Consitutional process of earmarks, never read his own racist, anti-semitic newsletter for 20 years and never met a morally relativistic argument to blame America for something he didn't like.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maintain high cholesterol post Apocalypse

 
At least you'll stil have one ingredient to make your post-apocalyptic BLT if you have some of this stuff on hand.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conspiracists are stupid

Deciding to put a different spin on the 40th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
 
Here's the "only man who can save America" explaining he hasn't the time to deal with any new 9/11 investigation.  It's too controversial and he's got too much to deal with.  Watch the video:
 
Ron Paul has never specifically come out and said he's a "truther" per se.  He has shown solidarity with "Truther"organizations, not to mention his continued presence on Alex Jones' radio show, Alex Jones being the nations pre-eminent 9/11 Truther.  He has stated that the reason for the 9/11 attacks was American involvement in the middle east, most famously during a 2007 presidential debate.  Ron Paul hasn't said he isn't a "Truther", but he definately exudes "trutheriness".
 
Note:  This clip is also demonstrative of Paul's "bi-polariness" (if you'll excuse the reference).  Up until he addresses the 9/11 stuff, he sounds alright and makes some good points.  When he addresses the 9/11 issues, he sounds like a wacko.  It's almost a Jekyl-Hyde type reaction.  This is Ron Pauls main problem.  His embrace of wackos (and at least sympathy of their position) undermines what would otherwise be positions that make some sense.  You can be 100% right about the IMF or the Federal Reserve, but the minute you start blamining America for everything and embace stories of the government pepetrating 9/11, your points about monetary policy are lost in the static of your conspiracist insanity.
 
Even if you were to say Ron Paul isn't a Truther, his evasion to the question is typical of a career politician who doesn't want to be nailed down by giving a specific answer.  He has advocated a new investigation into 9/11, yet now has too much to deal with to investigate 9/11?  Is that the answer of a responsible man truly interested in getting to the bottom of the murder of 3.000 Americans, or a career pol covering his butt? 
 
Here is a real man dealing with a conspiracist nutcase:
 
 
Calling a man like Buzz Aldrin a "coward and a liar" isn't real smart.  Of course the guy thinks we didn't land on the moon and that the whole program was a vast government conspiracy.  Conspiracists like 9/11 truthers and those who think the moon landing were faked are sad, stupid people.
 
Here we have a study in the improper and proper response to their nonsense.  One man, who obviously sympathizes with the nutjobs, and another man who won't stand for their nonsense and insults.  If Ron Paul had an ounce of the courage Mr. Aldrin does, he wouldn't abide by the nonsense of the "truthers".  As a politician, it wouldn't be smart to haul off and kick the crap out of them (though it would be deserved), but even embracing their nonsense belies the guys underpinning sympathy for their beliefs. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »