About Me

Name:Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Obama's 10 Year "Fast Track" Energy Plan

We all know the story:  the Libs/Lefties/Democrats continually bleat about how drilling for more of our own oil/creating our own energy (through refinery construction new nuclear/coal power plant construction, etc.) will take us "10 years".
 
Obama's campaign hails the fact that he "fast tracked" legislation to increase funding, to the tune of 150 billion dollars, to increase research into alternative energy.  Remember, this is an increase in research funding - not actually doing anything about producing more energy - just working on alternative energy sources.
 
How long would this "fast track" take?  Would it begin to give us relief at the pump and in our electricity bills next week?  Next month?  Next year?  In five years?
 
How about 10 years?
 
Obama released a national ad saying he has "fast-track alternatives" to imported oil. On closer examination, those turn out to be his proposal to spend $150 billion over the coming decade on energy research. Ten years doesn't sound all that "fast" to us, and there's no guarantee that the research will result in less oil being imported.
 
Follow this link and read the whole article.
 
Again, that's ten years - just on research.  How long would it take (assuming there is some kind of breakthrough within that ten years) for any benefit to reach the American people?  Another decade?  Longer?
 
The Democrat shell game on energy continues...
 
(H/T: Hot Air)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NOAA Drops All Pretense at Scientific Objectivity?

When it comes to "climate change", it appears so.
 
Their latest press release on global temperatures for June 2008 appears to have completely disregarded their own satellite data.
 
It was the eighth warmest June on record for the globe, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported Wednesday in the 129 years since records were begun in 1880. And the first six months of the year were the ninth warmest since record keeping began in 1880, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center reported. The planets average temperature for June was 60.8 degrees Fahrenheit, 0.9 degrees warmer than average for the month.
 
DON’T BELIEVE A WORD OF IT. Just a few days ago, the University of Alabama, Hunstville came out with their global assessment and they reported the 22nd warmest in the 30 years of recrods in their data base (in other words the 9th coldest). In fact, their global mean was actually below the average (base period 1979-1998) with a value of -0.11C (-0.19F). The other NASA satellite source, RSS had June as the 13th coldest out of the last 30 years
 
 
NOAA uses the same temperature data from the satelites that everyone else does, Hadley, UAH, etc.  The problem comes in when NOAA "adjusts" those numbers using formulations they don't let anyone see.  That NASA/NOAA connection needs some independent verification as ICECAP points out. 
 
(H/T: ICECAP
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »