About Me

Name:Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Selling blood plasma for gas money?

 
Why not ride your bike to work?  Carpool?  Get a bus pass?  Walk? 
 
 
Correspondent Jeff Glor then reported on how, "...desperate times call for desperate measures. Some people are doing anything they can to save on gas, while others are trying to avoid buying gas altogether." As one example, Glor highlighted a woman from San Antonio, Texas named Jessica Busby: "Then there's Jessica Busby, using her bike to get to a blood donation center two times a week. She pumps out her own blood, making $40 a pop so she has enough money to pump gas."
 
Jessica Busby, 19, is one of a growing number of people that are donating some of their blood’s plasma for gas money.
 
The growing numbers of people doing this for gas money?  Give me a frickin break!  These stories really tick me off.  I'm supposed to get all mushy feeling for this person?  I live in San Antonio just like this moron.  San Antonio is pretty spread out, but give me a break.  I have three kids, a mortgage, two car notes, bills, and pay for gas just like everyone else.  I commute forty miles to work each day round trip - that's 200 miles a week, 800 miles a month.  And I still manage to have enough money to fill up my cars, even with the higher prices - and not have to sell off my bodily fluids to pay for it..
 
How many people, really, have adjusted their lives to accomodate the price of gas?  I mean really adjusted?  Not just cutting out some driving, but actually having to make serious, drastic steps to account for the higher fuel costs.  I know it is less than is being hyped by the media.  I'm not saying there aren't people having to make adjustments, but this is this persons ONLY recourse?
 
And the math doesn't add up.  If she is really doing this twice a week, every week - that's $320 dollars in gas a month!  I don't spend that much money on gas filling up two cars with all the driving my family and I do.  Granted I don't drive a SUV to work.  I drive a Chevy Cavalier.  And we also have a V6 minivan.  And we put over a 1000 miles a month on both cars.  And I live in the same town this person does and drive many miles to work every month.
 
I call bullshinola!
 
Busby said she was “totally strapped for cash” and needed to find a way to keep her gas tank full.
 
If I had to guess, this person is living WAY outside her means - like most Americans, and is unwilling to make REAL (though hard) adjustments to her lifestyle.  I bet even money she has a cell phone.  Does she have cable TV?  I find it interesting there is no mention of the type of vehicle she drives in the story - is it an SUV?  A sports car?  It is most assuredly more vehicle than she needs if she is having this much trouble filling it up.
 
Gas here in San Antonio is only a dollar more a gallon than it was a year ago.  So on average (depending on which vehicle) I'm spending about $50-$75 more a month on gas than a year ago for TWO vehicles.  Yes, that's $50-$75 I could be spending on other things but it is hardly enough to cause my family a financial crises.
 
I found this little nugget on the Democratic Underground left by a commenter:
 
I can only hope the Dem nominee and a Dem congress can start to turn this sluggish supertanker of an economy around.
This person is kidding right?  It's under a Dem congress that the gas prices have skyrocketed!  Show me where the government has involved itself in anything and made it cheaper! 
 
I'm sure there is more to this story, but as is typical the MSM doesn't offer too many details. 
 
Just enough info for a sob story to push an agenda.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trapped in Arctic Ice...which shouldn't be there

Irony, it seems, is a dish that is best served cold.
 
And it is very cold in the Arctic...
 
The ice master studies the mountains of white packed around the ship while the 24,000-horsepower diesel engines work at full throttle to open a path. The ship rises slowly onto the barrier of ice, crushes it and tosses aside blocks the size of small cars as if they were ice cubes in a glass. It creeps ahead a few metres, then comes to a halt, its bow firmly wedged in the ice. After doing this for two days, the ship can go no farther.
 
The ice master confers with the captain, who makes a call to the engine room. The engines are shut down. He turns to those of us watching the drama unfold, and we are shocked by his words: "Now, only nature can help this ship." We are doomed to drift.
 
What irony. I am a passenger on one of the most powerful icebreakers in the world, travelling through the Northwest Passage - which is supposed to become almost ice-free in a time of global warming, the next shipping route across the top of the world - and here we are, stuck in the ice, engines shut down, bridge deserted. Only time and tide can free us.
 
"Damn you Al Gore!  Damn you straight to Hell!"
 
More here and here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

First the Polar Bear. Now...

Eco-extremists now suing to list the Pacific Walrus as "threatened".

A conservation group gave notice Tuesday that it will sue to force federal action on a petition to list the Pacific walrus as a threatened species because of threats from global warming and offshore petroleum development.
 
Funny how they don't list those saints of the arctic, the Polar Bear, as a threat:
 
"Tastes like chicken..."
 
OK, that's probably a seal, but they DO eat walrus as well.  Look at the link above.
 
I'd be willing to bet more walrus meet their fate from the teeth of the polar bear than any "offshore petroleum development".
 
This is what happens when you give in to the wacko argument.  Lawsuit after lawsuit is sure to follow.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Real Cost of the "Climate Security Act"

Otherwise known as the Lieberman/Warner POS.
 
Here in America, one such piece of legislation, the Lieberman/Warner climate security act "A bill to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to establish a program to decrease emissions of greenhouse gases, and for other purposes" would result, according to a study by the Heritage Foundation, in:

  • Cumulative gross domestic product (GDP) losses of at least $1.7 trillion and could reach $4.8 trillion by 2030 (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • Single-year GDP losses hit at least $155 billion and realistically could exceed $500 billion (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • Annual job losses exceeding 500,000 before 2030 and approaching 1,000,000.

     

  • The annual cost of emission permits to energy users to be at least $100 billion by 2020 and could exceed $300 billion by 2030 (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • The average household paying $467 more each year for its natural gas and electricity (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars). That means that the average household will spend an additional $8,870 to purchase household energy over the period 2012 through 2030.

     

    All in the name of fighting a non-existent threat.

  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Andromeda Strain" Pt. 2-What a pile of crap huh?

    Another two hours of my life I'll never get back.
     
    I actually laughed more during this movie than the first episode.  It was so full of politically correct pap and slaps at the military and the Bush administration the script must have been written by Daily Kos posters and the entire movie bankrolled by George Soros.
     
    Let's see:  We have reference to "illegal wiretaps", pontificating about terrorists at Gitmo; the Army doctor played by Ricky Shroder (the guy from the first episode who couldn't wait to nuke EVERYTHING) comes out as a closet homosexual being repressed by the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy; the current administration comes off as destroyers of Mother Earth with their continued want to mine deep sea vents; environmentalists attack and capture one of the new vent mining platforms out in the ocean decrying the rape of the planet (to which they suffer no consequences - the President doesn't order the platform recaptured since "enough people have died today");

    BREATH...
     
    The intrepid reporter is hunted by government types who look suspiciously like Blackwater operatives; "Andromeda" (the "virus"), it turns out, comes from our future - sent back by someone to warn us of our raping of the planet:  You see the docs discover that Andromeda can only be killed by a specific bacteria which grow on those same undersea vents the evil President wants to mine.  In the future this mining apparently destroyed the bacteria leaving Earth defenseless in the wake of Andromeda's later appearance at some point in the future.  Of course the paradox plot holes abound at this point:  If Andromeda was created at some point in the future and the future us's wanted to warn us of what we were doing and Andromeda's deadly consequences, then why not just send something else back to the past to warn of our future doom?  And if the bacteria had been destroyed by mining, how did our future us's figure out that the same bacteria could destroy Andromeda?  And the bacteria wasn't retrieved from the vents in present time anyway - it was collected at an earlier point, kept in a lab freezer somewhere.  The Wildfire docs use this frozen bacteria (discovered well before any mining) to defeat Andromeda and use this same frozen bacteria to grow more cultures at Wildfire to ultimately defeat the Andromeda strain in the first place.  The point the docs come up with about how the mining will destroy the bacteria is irrelevant since the bacteria was discovered, collected and frozen before any of the mining ever happened. 

    BREATH...
     
    Then we have a mysterious Cigarette Smoking Man, a la X-Files (who chews nicotine gum until the end of the movie when he then lights up) running a massive government conspiracy to keep a sample of Andromeda for bio-weapon use - killing everyone who gets in the way, except the intrepid reporter and any of the scientists who know about the conspiracy and the players involved.  Instead, the military brass are assassinated by a mysterious character.  Even the family members who were kidnapped by this guy to force one of the Wildfire docs to give up a sample are apparently OK and not eliminated by the mysterious guy, even though they have seen his face, know who he is, and know the extent of his involvement in the conspiracy.
     
    How about the plot hole for the doc at Wildfire who is exposed to Andromeda - it begins eating through her protective gear.  The head doc comes to her rescue, but then has to leave to keep the lab from blowing up.  We don't come back to the doc exposed to Andromeda until the end of the movie - how did she survive her exposure?  What was done to keep the Andromeda released into the room she was in from escaping further in the lab complex?  No resolution whatsoever.  This movie is full of such garbage.
     
    For a more detailed analysis (and a funnier one too), go here.  But just so you can get a flair for what some others say, take a look at this:
     
    It provides a perfect analogy to the entire movie. The only way this mess should get a thumbs-up is if a reviewer cut one off in protest and threw it in the air. The rest of the ending is fairly anticlimactic, with a few assorted assassinations as everyone starts covering up the government’s role in the affair. Everyone’s loved ones suddenly finds themselves free of the personal problems that plagued them. The President declares that he’ll continue vent mining despite the strongly-worded memo from the future, which makes sense; I’d try to kill Future Earth too, after a stunt like Andromeda.
     
    And this:
     
    This remake is the usual Hollyweird treatment: Wretched politically correct excess piled on wretchedly politically correct excess, wholesale revision or replacement of the story with new material and characters not in the book, and endless, heavy-handed moralizing. The acting is poor, and the characters are not credible. It is, in a word, junk.
     
    Indeed.
     
    I'll end with the immortal words of Homer Simpson (paraphrased):
     
    "Yeah Moe, that movie sure did suck last night.  It just plain sucked.  I've seen movies that suck before, but this was the suckiest piece of suck that ever sucked!"
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »