About Me

Name:Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

The Real Cost of the "Climate Security Act"

Otherwise known as the Lieberman/Warner POS.
 
Here in America, one such piece of legislation, the Lieberman/Warner climate security act "A bill to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to establish a program to decrease emissions of greenhouse gases, and for other purposes" would result, according to a study by the Heritage Foundation, in:

  • Cumulative gross domestic product (GDP) losses of at least $1.7 trillion and could reach $4.8 trillion by 2030 (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • Single-year GDP losses hit at least $155 billion and realistically could exceed $500 billion (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • Annual job losses exceeding 500,000 before 2030 and approaching 1,000,000.

     

  • The annual cost of emission permits to energy users to be at least $100 billion by 2020 and could exceed $300 billion by 2030 (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars).

     

  • The average household paying $467 more each year for its natural gas and electricity (in inflation-adjusted 2006 dollars). That means that the average household will spend an additional $8,870 to purchase household energy over the period 2012 through 2030.

     

    All in the name of fighting a non-existent threat.

  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Andromeda Strain" Pt. 2-What a pile of crap huh?

    Another two hours of my life I'll never get back.
     
    I actually laughed more during this movie than the first episode.  It was so full of politically correct pap and slaps at the military and the Bush administration the script must have been written by Daily Kos posters and the entire movie bankrolled by George Soros.
     
    Let's see:  We have reference to "illegal wiretaps", pontificating about terrorists at Gitmo; the Army doctor played by Ricky Shroder (the guy from the first episode who couldn't wait to nuke EVERYTHING) comes out as a closet homosexual being repressed by the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy; the current administration comes off as destroyers of Mother Earth with their continued want to mine deep sea vents; environmentalists attack and capture one of the new vent mining platforms out in the ocean decrying the rape of the planet (to which they suffer no consequences - the President doesn't order the platform recaptured since "enough people have died today");

    BREATH...
     
    The intrepid reporter is hunted by government types who look suspiciously like Blackwater operatives; "Andromeda" (the "virus"), it turns out, comes from our future - sent back by someone to warn us of our raping of the planet:  You see the docs discover that Andromeda can only be killed by a specific bacteria which grow on those same undersea vents the evil President wants to mine.  In the future this mining apparently destroyed the bacteria leaving Earth defenseless in the wake of Andromeda's later appearance at some point in the future.  Of course the paradox plot holes abound at this point:  If Andromeda was created at some point in the future and the future us's wanted to warn us of what we were doing and Andromeda's deadly consequences, then why not just send something else back to the past to warn of our future doom?  And if the bacteria had been destroyed by mining, how did our future us's figure out that the same bacteria could destroy Andromeda?  And the bacteria wasn't retrieved from the vents in present time anyway - it was collected at an earlier point, kept in a lab freezer somewhere.  The Wildfire docs use this frozen bacteria (discovered well before any mining) to defeat Andromeda and use this same frozen bacteria to grow more cultures at Wildfire to ultimately defeat the Andromeda strain in the first place.  The point the docs come up with about how the mining will destroy the bacteria is irrelevant since the bacteria was discovered, collected and frozen before any of the mining ever happened. 

    BREATH...
     
    Then we have a mysterious Cigarette Smoking Man, a la X-Files (who chews nicotine gum until the end of the movie when he then lights up) running a massive government conspiracy to keep a sample of Andromeda for bio-weapon use - killing everyone who gets in the way, except the intrepid reporter and any of the scientists who know about the conspiracy and the players involved.  Instead, the military brass are assassinated by a mysterious character.  Even the family members who were kidnapped by this guy to force one of the Wildfire docs to give up a sample are apparently OK and not eliminated by the mysterious guy, even though they have seen his face, know who he is, and know the extent of his involvement in the conspiracy.
     
    How about the plot hole for the doc at Wildfire who is exposed to Andromeda - it begins eating through her protective gear.  The head doc comes to her rescue, but then has to leave to keep the lab from blowing up.  We don't come back to the doc exposed to Andromeda until the end of the movie - how did she survive her exposure?  What was done to keep the Andromeda released into the room she was in from escaping further in the lab complex?  No resolution whatsoever.  This movie is full of such garbage.
     
    For a more detailed analysis (and a funnier one too), go here.  But just so you can get a flair for what some others say, take a look at this:
     
    It provides a perfect analogy to the entire movie. The only way this mess should get a thumbs-up is if a reviewer cut one off in protest and threw it in the air. The rest of the ending is fairly anticlimactic, with a few assorted assassinations as everyone starts covering up the government’s role in the affair. Everyone’s loved ones suddenly finds themselves free of the personal problems that plagued them. The President declares that he’ll continue vent mining despite the strongly-worded memo from the future, which makes sense; I’d try to kill Future Earth too, after a stunt like Andromeda.
     
    And this:
     
    This remake is the usual Hollyweird treatment: Wretched politically correct excess piled on wretchedly politically correct excess, wholesale revision or replacement of the story with new material and characters not in the book, and endless, heavy-handed moralizing. The acting is poor, and the characters are not credible. It is, in a word, junk.
     
    Indeed.
     
    I'll end with the immortal words of Homer Simpson (paraphrased):
     
    "Yeah Moe, that movie sure did suck last night.  It just plain sucked.  I've seen movies that suck before, but this was the suckiest piece of suck that ever sucked!"
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    "Andromeda Strain" remake...umm...sucks

    Take a bit of sci-fi legend, a great story, mix in a fair amount of BDS and Government (American Government) is evil, and...
     
    BAMMO!
     
    You've got the 2008 A&E remake of the 1971 movie classic "The Andromeda Strain".  (Both movies based on the 1969 novel by Michael Crichton.)  If you watched the first part of this mish-mash of bad remade goop that's two hours of your life you'll never get back again.  Yes, it was that bad.
     
     
    I really enjoyed the 1971 movie.  It was a bit slow, but the minutia of the original is what made it interesting.  All the detail in entering the Wildfire Lab.  The extended scenes of decontamination.  The agonizing slowness with which the doctors and scientists had to react to an extra-terrestrial contagion with the technology of the time.  Everything about the original movie was done well. 
     
    This remake is so full of politically correct crap and forumulaic Hollywood garbage the bloody alien contagion takes a back seat in the story!  I kid you not.  The reason for the movie takes a back seat to some kind of convoluted government conspiracy theory. 
     
    We have the intrepid reporter who is out to expose the fraud.  We have the evil US government trying desperately to cover up something, though your not quite sure what really.  You assume we (the US) wants to keep Andromeda for nefarious purposes.  This is hinted at in the original movie, but it takes center stage in this incarnation.
     
    Moral relativism abounds as well.  The doctors wax philosophic about how Saddam Hussein didn't have WMD's unitl WE (the US) gave them to him.  Also, another subplot which goes nowhere mentions how China had a biological weapons incident which killed several score of innocent Chinese civilians.  But this is excused by the Chinese protagonist since WE (the US) was developing them too.  The fact that WE weren't experimenting on our own citizens must have been left out of the script but I digress.
     
    We have a PC and diverse cast - two females, one who is black.  An Asian.  A hispanic.  A black four star general.  We've got it all.  All of the white males in the movie are portrayed as evil of course (or at the very least, callous) from the President of the US all the way down to the white doctor on the scientific team who, though he is supposed to be a doctor and research scientist, can't wait to nuke everything.  I can just guess what his doctoral thesis was - "Nuke It!"  That's pretty much all he says for the first hour and a half.
     
    The "Odd-Man Hypothesis", a fictional edict where a unmarried male is the go to guy for making command decisions concerning the detonation of the labs nuclear safeguard is apparently forgotten, as a female AF pilot is chosen to drop a tactical nuke an an American town -  a situation where an unmarried male would most certainly be chosen by the military if the "Odd-man" was indeed taken seriously in this movie.  Not to mention the crappy salute the female pilot gives her commander just prior to her mission.  Why is it most actors can't render an even halfway decent salute?  Why is it also that any actor portraying a military member who wears a beret wears that same beret like they were in Paris eating crepes under the Eiffel Tower?
     
    Andre Braugher as General George Mancheck in A&E's original mini-series “The Andromeda Strain.”A&E/Diyah Pera - Tuesday, May, 20, 2008, 9:20 PM
    It's a beret!  Not a Chef's Hat!  mon Dieu!
     
    This movie is so full of it's own crap it defies common sense.  A scene where an Army soldier becomes infected, goes on a rampage shooting several soldiers with an M-16.  All of these soldiers are wearing full body armor and are mowed down while another soldier tries shooting the crazed soldier several times to no effect for several moments - his bullets not penetrating that same body armor.  Another scene has a soldier driving a humvee through a military compound - his humvees coming under immediate fire by a dozen soldiers firing rifles, machine guns, etc. including an M2 .50 cal all to little effect on a not up-armored vehicle before some rounds finally penetrate the window glass.  Yeah, the production values in this one are pretty lame.
     
    And we have the "Star Trek" rip-offs as well.  The doctors at the lab wearing "cards" which mimic the "communicators" of ST: TNG style.  And there is an over reliance on "Computer."  The doctors spend more time pontificating about politics and WMD than doing any actual work fighting "Amdromeda" with the "Computer" doing a majority of the research.
     
    I hate remakes.  They are almost universally bad.  This one is no different.  Hollywood just can't keep from injecting political correctness into everything, now including TV mini-series.  My wife enjoyed the show and my daughters liked it too.  My son, God bless him saw the same stuff I did and helped me enjoy the time making fun of all the plot holes and crap we saw.  I'm surprised Ridley and Tony Scott allowed this to wear their names as producers.
     
    I know I'm asking for trouble, but I will watch the next part tonight.  Another review will follow tomorrow.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »