About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Remember The Alamo!

172 years ago today...


Prefigured by LTC William B. Travis:

Commandancy of the Alamo
Bexar, Feby. 24th 1836

To the People of Texas & all Americans in the world –

Fellow citizens & compatriots — I am besieged by a thousand or more of the Mexicans under Santa Anna — I have sustained a continual Bombardment & cannonade for 24 hours & have not lost a man — The enemy has demanded a surrender at discretion, otherwise, the garrison are to be put to the sword, if the fort is taken — I have answered the demand with a cannon shot, & our flag still waves proudly from the walls — I shall never surrender or retreat. Then, I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid, with all dispatch — The enemy is receiving reinforcements daily & will no doubt increase to three or four thousand in four or five days. If this call is neglected, I am determined to sustain myself as long as possible & die like a soldier who never forgets what is due to his own honor & that of his country –

Victory or Death.

William Barret Travis
Lt. Col. Comdt.

View the letter here.




(H/T: Lone Star Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another reason to hate Basketball

"Latina Noche"?

What?!

Will they also have an Irish Night?  Asian Night?  How about a Jihadi Night?

The first two, not so much I think.  But the third one...

The team will be wearing special jerseys commemorating the NBA's Latin Nights promotion, according to team spokeswoman Stacy Mitch. 

"The jersey reads "LOS" over the standard Spurs logo, and it has a patch on the upper right side reading 'Noche Latina.


"
It won't be the San Antonio Spurs that take the hardwood tonight at the AT&T Center for a critical game against the Indiana Pacers, it will be "Los Spurs."


Maybe it's just me, but is this completely ridiculous or what?  And it begs the question - if the San Antonio Spurs were the Kansas City Spurs would they also have a "Latina Noche"?  How about changing other sports jerseys - Los Packers or Los Steelers?  How well do you think that would fly?  I know, like a fart in church...

Or is this pure pandering to a specific 'ethnic' group?

The more and more Los Spurs do, the less I like them and basketball.  And I HATE basketball.  We got Manu Ginobili from Argentina.  They started a war with our buds, the Brits a few years back.  And Tony Parker.  A Frenchman.  A FRICKIN FRENCHMAN!

Did I mention I HATE basketball?

I think now I LOATHE basketball...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

D & D and Me

Yes, I played Dungeons & Dragons.
 
 
There.
 
 
I said it.
 
 
What's funny is how D&D has taken on such a geeky conotation in today's culture.  People joke about it.  Comedians write songs about it.  It is genereally impugned as something which kept young adolescent boys from experiencing the joys of dating and other stuff young adolescent boys did 25 years ago.  No mention is ever given that MANY adolescent boys played D&D 25 years ago and fail to include it on said list of stuff we did... (Side note:  I don't buy the whole dating angle either.  Maybe it's just me.  I only ever dated three girls growing up.  I only ever kissed two girls growing up and one of them was my high school sweetheart whom I've now been married to for 21 years - SO THERE!!)
 
 
Even my kids got in on making fun of dear old dad.  "You played D&D?",  they ask.  "YES.  And it was fun.",  I reply.  "Your a dork dad."  Then I utter the coup de grace' and say, "How much time did you spend on the computer playing Oblivion (a computer RPG) last weekend?"
 
 
Crickets.
 
 
Oh, and let's not forget the wife.  I played D&D before I started dating her when we were in high school.  But I did dally in it on occasion after we were married.  "I just don't understand how a grown man can sit around rolling dice and looking at a piece of paper imagining they are fighting monsters."  My most recent retort when this issue flairs up in the house (woman just don't understand men) is "Just what did you learn on Oprah/Dr. Phil/Ellen/Etc. today dear?" or, "Don't forget to DVR the latest Lifetime Movie of the Week, dear."
 
 
Crickets.
 
 
Like I said, I played D&D.  I wasn't a hardcore player by any means.  I can actually count on two hands the number of times I ever actually engaged in real 'campaigns' in my entire life.  I was more into the peripherals - making characters, reading the 'literature' (manuals, modules, etc.), making maps on graph paper for no good reason.  All that stuff.  It was fun.
 
 
It was another activity I engaged in in a time before my first car and the freedom that entails for a teenager.  It was a time before the internet, though not a time before home game systems (Atari 2600 baby!) or home computers (a good childhood friend of mine had an Apple IIE).  I was a consumate book reader (still am).  Fantasy and sci-fi novels being my favorite.  I cannot count how many times I read and re-read TLOTR trilogy as a teen (or an adult).  D&D touched that imaginative spark in my mind.  It was a world of almost pure imagination (there's the Willy Wonka reference.  This post has everything!) 
 
 
You could play with pre-made game modules or your Dungeon Master could make up entire scenarios for you and your compatriots to participate in.  Other than the special dice needed for the game, usually you had a pad of paper, you homemade character sheets and something to write with.  Everything else was a product of your mind.  Imagining the monsters you were facing, the environements you were in, putting yourself into the situations you were given and solving the problem to get out of a trap or get the treasure or complete the quest.  That was one of the most enjoyable aspects of it for me.  It allowed for a creative outlet.  It stimulated creative thinking, problem solving.  It was (besides little league football) my earliest experience in group dynamics.  It also helped me learn how to read people.  As a poker player reads his opponents, I learned to read the Dungeon Master and my fellow players.  I learned to "read peoples eyes" as it were.  Was the Dungeon Master lying?  Could I trust my players in certain situations?  A skill which has helped me immensely throughout my life and in my military and law enforcement careers BTW. 
 
 
I enjoyed my experience with D&D.  I never fell for the hype about it being "a tool of the Devil."  I am (and was even then) more confident in my faith in God than those who blamed D&D for all matter of juvenile problems.  The railing against D&D was probably one of the earliest examples (beside the evil "rock music") of nanny statism.  D&D was blamed for everything.  Yes, there were incidents where D&D was cited as a contributing factor but they were so overblown and hyped by an alarmist media that they exagerrated the problem while ignoring the greater symptoms.  A teen who kills themself has more issues in their life than how often they may have played D&D.  This is just common sense.  Yet the hype and alarmism continued.
 
 
My own mother and I even had our first (and biggest) falling out over that very fact.  As I stated, I didn't actually play D&D on a regular basis, but I did spend time dealing with peripheral issue of the game as explained above.  At this time in the early 80's, my mom confused her Christian faith with fanaticism and thought D&D WAS a "tool of the devil".  She had been told as much in church.  I came home from school one day to find all my D&D material (not much) and some posters of scatily clad females (the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders) missing from my room.  My mother had 'confiscated' all of my stuff, and had taken it to the church where they had a grand old bonfire scheduled for the Wednesday evening service.  They were going to burn D&D stuff, albums, tapes, all manner of "evil".  Now my mom (amongst others) apparently didn't see the irony and hypocrisy involved in what they were doing.  You see, it was "for the children."  They fell for the hype.  This incident also was my biggest revelation into the "TV preacher" phenomena of the period.  Jimmy Swaggart.  Benny Hinn.  My parents watched all those crooks.  And that incident with taking my stuff was the time in my life all kids reach where they break with their parents.
 
 
So in a weird kind of way, D&D also allowed me to grow up a little and face some larger life issues - faith, God, religion, and my relationship with my parents.
 
 
But D&D was and is just a game.  A good game I think which I enjoyed immensely when I was a teen (and even a couple of times when I first came in the military and was deployed to Germany and Panama early in my career).  There were and are worse things kids could do with their time.  Even now when I make the occasional journey to one of the local comic book stores, you can see kids (and many a grownup?) still playing similar RPG's or even D&D.  They aren't out making mischief.  They aren't getting teenage girls pregnant.  They aren't otherwise making themselves a burden on society.  They are rolling the 4, 6, 8 or 12 sided dice and having fun.
 
 
Rest in Peace, Gary Gygax.
 
UPDATE (1449 CST):  Follow this link to find out what kind of D&D character you could be.  Answer the survey questions honestly.  It takes 15-20 minutes, but it figures up your profile characteristcs and everything. 
 
It's pretty neat.  And fun too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FARC Hearts Barack

Yeah.  It seems they are really hoping the Obamamessiah is the new US President.  So say captured FARC computers.
 
Why?
 
Because they believe Obama is more in line with their Marxist line of thought.
 
What?
 

Captured FARC computers name Obama

Dead terrorist Raul Reyes had information that FARC was meeting "gringos" about Obama.
 
The computers captured this past weekend by Colombian soldiers at the campsite of FARC #2 Raul Reyes contained loads of damning information on FARC sympathizers and allies.
 
FARC Leader Raul Reyes was killed this weekend by Colombian forces. (LePoint)
 
The Colombians captured two FARC terrorist laptop computers at the terrorist camp. The Colombians discovered a treasure trove of information on the laptops including:
 
-- FARC connections with Ecuadorean president Rafael Correa
-- Records of $300 million offerings from Hugo Chavez
-- Thank you notes from Hugo Chavez dating back to 1992
-- Uranium purchasing records
-- Directions on how to make a Dirty Bomb
 
But, no one expected this---
 
The FARC Terrorists were hoping and expecting that Barack Obama would win the US elections in November because he was most aligned with the Colombian Marxist group.  This document was posted at Martha Colmenares (in Spanish) and Free Republic:
"6. Los gringos pedirán cita con el ministro para solicitarle nos comunicara su interés en conversar estos temas. Dicen que el nuevo presidente de su país será Obama y que ellos están interesados en sus compatriotas. Obama no apoyara Plan Colombia ni firma de TLC. Aquí respondimos que nos interesan las relaciones con todos los gobiernos en igualdad de condiciones y que en el caso de Estados Unidos se requiere in pronunciamiento público expresando su interés en conversar con las Farc dada su eterna guerra con nosotros.

Es todo, Abrazos, Raúl."

(translated)
6. The gringos will ask for an appointment with the minister to solicit him to communicate to us his interest in discussing these topics. They say that the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support "Plan Colombia" nor will he sign the TLC (Colombian Free Trade agreement). Here we responded that we are interested in relations with all governments in equality of conditions and that in the case of the US it is required a public pronouncement expressing their interest in talking with the FARC given their eternal war against us.
Hat Tip BG
 
You've got to hand it to dead FARC terrorists...
Their analysis of Barack Obama is spot on.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's not LESS Christian. It's NOT Christian

Oh, wait. He’s serious.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told a crowd at Hocking College in Nelsonville, Ohio, Sunday that he believes the Sermon on the Mount justifies his support for legal recognition of same-sex unions. He also told the crowd that his position in favor of legalized abortion does not make him “less Christian.”

“I don’t think it [a same-sex union] should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state,” said Obama. “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans.” ((Hear audio from WTAP-TV)) St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans condemns homosexual acts as unnatural and sinful.

Obama’s mention of the Sermon on the Mount in justifying legal recognition of same-sex unions may have been a reference to the Golden Rule: “Do to others what you would have them do to you.” Or it may have been a reference to another famous line: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged.”

It doesn’t make you less Christian to support gay marriage or abortion…it makes you not Christian. Religions have rules. If you don’t want to abide by them, don’t feel you need to belong to a religion — the world is not forcing you to ascribe voluntarily to a set of rules and regulations based on a holy book. Heck, its not even forcing you to ascribe to one of those feel-good pseudo-religions that tell you that what is good is whatever you feel is good. But if you’re going to choose to align yourself with Christianity, you’re going to have to, sooner or later, come face to face with the vast chasm between your beliefs and the standards and morality that Christ taught.
 
Here we go again.  Liberal democrats couching their moral relativism in Christianity.  Going back to the tried an true playbook of attempting to usurp traditional Christian values by contradicting those same values; or asscribing to those values something which is in direct conflict with those values.
 
Just as Bill Clintons daliences were "his own business."  Were they?  What about the second party of the act?  What about the sancity of his 'marriage'?  What about the sanctity of the White House?  "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."  Isn't that what the libs do all the time?  Already this campaign season, John McCain, a Republican, has had his "values" called into question and accusations thrown around about HIS personal life by those same holier than thou libs.  Which is it?  Are we to follow Jesus' (God's) teachings or not?  Or are we to ascribe some relativistic measure to them and apply them only when they are convenient?
 
Now the Obamamessiah is trying to find justification in the Sermon on the Mount for same-sex marriage?  Just like those Justices found a right to abortion in the Constitution yes?
 
And this is a great closer:
 
As C. S. Lewis once said,

A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic – on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg – or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.

He either is, or he isn’t the Son of God. His teachings either are or they aren’t Truth. Pick your poison. Cast your lots. But don’t sit on the fence and try to mold His teachings to your own weird ideological goals. If you believe in what you believe, you should do so without hiding behind banal rhetoric intended to appeal to people who clearly aren’t paying attention.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anti-Shark Device eaten by Irony-Loving Great White

shark02.jpg
 
This is awkward…during the testing phase for the Shark Shield, an electronic device that is designed to go on the back of surfboards to keep sharks away, one of the devices was actually eaten by a shark.
 
Yeah, not only did this thing not keep sharks away, but it actually attracted the attention of a 12-foot great white enough that it mistook it for a tasty snack. Luckily, it was on a buoy and not a surfboard at the time.
 
Instructions for use?
 
"The surf product only can be guaranteed to work when it's stationary, not when it's surfing in the wave or paddling," Mr Hartley said.
 
Well heck!  Sounds super!  Where can I get one?!  Irony sure is ironic isn't it?
 
More here and here.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

5 Organic Food Myths

Myth No. 1: Organic food is healthier.
 
Actually, scientific studies show more health risks from organic food than conventional food. This month in California, for instance, Salmonella was found in organic fertilisers which could contaminate fruit and vegetables. 

Myth No. 2: Organic farming is good for the environment. 
 
In Britain, the yield of wheat from organic farms is only half that from conventional farms. If all our food was organic, we would have to grub up hedgerows and cut down forests just to produce enough food. We would use twice the water, do at least twice the ploughing ­ and use twice the amount of petrol and diesel. 

Myth No. 3: Organic farmers don't use pesticides. 
 
The Canadian Food Safety Agency found pesticide residues in as many organic baby foods as conventional baby food and the highest pesticide level was in an organic food.
 
Organic farmers spray crops with 'natural' pesticides such as the noxious microbe BT which kills bees, ladybirds and butterflies as well as pests by releasing the same toxin made by genetically modified plants. If inhaled, it can cause bronchitis and worsen asthma.
 
Organic farmers treat fungus with copper solutions which also poisons earthworms and friendly bacteria. They also use Derris which can cause Parkinson's disease; pyrethroids, which cause tumours in mice; and potassium permanganate which kills fish.

Myth No 4: Organic food does not contain additives.
 
At least three dozen 'E' numbers are allowed as additives, preservatives, flavourings, binders, anti-caking agents, antioxidants and processing agents in 'organic' food.
 
For cleaning and disinfection, organic farmers use the same substances as conventional farmers, including formaldehyde, caustic soda, nitric and phosphoric acid, quicklime, alcohol and other highly toxic chemicals that can contaminate food.
 
Organically reared animals can have up to a quarter of their daily food from non-organic sources and all organic food can contain five per cent of conventional ingredients.

• Myth No. 5: The demand for organic food is at an all-time high.
 
Even with the support of TV chefs Jamie Oliver and Hugh Fearnley-Wittingstall, only two per cent of the food sold in Britain is organic. At the end of the Second World War all our food was organic so, in fact, demand has actually gone down by 98 per cent over the last 60 years.
 
Summation:  Organic food is a fashion and lifestyle choice. It is probably no worse for you or the environment than conventional foods, but organic proponents should get their facts straight and stop using dubious claims about 'natural' meaning 'better' and stick to the facts.
 
 
Another drawback to organics is cost.  You will pay in the range of 2-4x as much for organic produce and other foods than for 'conventional' food unless you have access to a farmer's market near you as opposed to a Whole Foods Market let's say.  This one fact alone is not insignificant if you're on a budget.
 
And something else to keep in mind, and I am speaking of recent personal experience.
 
If you buy organic produce (fruits, vegetables) you will more than likely be taking along some stragglers with you in your drive home.  What do I mean?
 
When my wife started her chemo six weeks ago, I wanted to do a food changeover in the house and I figured I'd give organics a try.  I was already expecting the increased cost so that wasn't so much an issue.  I went shopping at the Whole Foods Market here in San Antonio, a not insubstantial drive from my house BTW as opposed the the five minute drive to the Super Wal-Mart or HEB.
 
I spent almost $100 on fruits and vegetables alone.  All organic.  All looked great.  I bought several different types of salad greens, cauliflower, broccolli, tomatos, spinach, bananas, blackberries, blueberries, raspberries, oranges, pineapple, a bunch of stuff.
 
Got the stuff home and while preparing to store it, found that the blackberries and raspberries and some of the greens were full, FULL, of insects.  Not dead insect carcasses mind you.  Live bugs.  Now in the grand scheme of things, this isn't SUCH a big deal - clean the stuff up, wash it off right and it's good to go.  But call me a crazy capitalist, but if I'm going to spend a lrage amount of money on fruit and vegetables, it should be bug free.  Right?  and my daughter, who loves all kinds of berries, couldn't eat any of them since she couldn't get past the "psychological" aspect of bugs in the food.  She's a 14 year old girl, she's supposed to be squemish!
 
As they say, buyer beware.  Don't fall for the hype.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Invisible Warships?

They're already here!  And they ROCK!
 
 
The “stealthiest” ship that currently exists is Sweden’s Visby Corvette. Apart from being painted in grey dazzle camouflage and made of low-radar reflectivity materials, it also does not use propellers, which are the noisiest part of a ship. The vessel also has the lowest “magnetic signature” of any current warship.
 
 
But the next generation of warships could be truly invisible by exploiting “metamaterials” – artificially engineered structures first dreamt up by physicist John Pendry at Imperial College, London. Metamaterials are tailored to have specific electromagnetic properties not found in nature. In particular, they can bend light around an object, making it appear to an observer as though the waves have passed through empty space.
 
About the research, Chris Lavers writes, “If optical and radar metamaterials could be developed, they might provide a way to make a ship invisible to both human observers and radar systems, although the challenges of building a cloak big enough to hide an entire ship are huge.”
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yeah, I know what I said...

Or, "How NOT to answer a question while standing in line to vote."
 
And I know what I said about taking a hiatus.  But today is the Texas primary (who cares about the other states?  Oh.  Right.  Hillary!)
 
Since I voted early last Friday, I figured I'd relate my own little story about waiting in the line to vote.
 
I arrived at my local polling place and there was a line.  Not a huge line, but a line nonetheless.  I don't like lines.  I HATE lines.  One of the reasons I won't eat at a Luby's or Golden Corral or any type of cafeteria is that I have to stand in a frickin line.  I never understood that.  Why are those resteraunts so popular?  Especially with elderly people.  The very people who can't or shouldn't stand in a line will do it willingly for a $6 steak!  Personally, if I go to a resteraunt I want the food to come to me.  Am I alone in this thinking?  I think not.  That's just as bad as going to a resteraunt where you cook your own food.  What's up with that?
 
But I digress.
 
Anyway, I don't like lines and wondered if I wouldn't just come back on Tuesday.  Then my brain started working and I realized Tuesday would be a day of MASSIVE lines, not to mention probably having to deal with associated Paulnuts and other wackos.  I decide this line wasn't too terribly long after all.
 
I took a book with me.  Light reading.  "A Study of Migraines" by Merck.  The only other book I had in the car was "Liberal Facism".  So I took the migraine book.  While reading it the guy waiting in line in front of me asked me if I was a doctor.  The small book was that detailed and in depth.  I though it was just going to be an informational handbook.  No.  As a migraineur I don't really need to know the worldwide prevalance of photo/phonophobia amongst 18-24 year olds, blah, blah, blah.  TMI.  It helped pass the time though.
 
As the line wound its way into the polling place, I noticed a conversation beginning a few people behind me.  The Obamamaniacs had apparently arrived.  There was also a bit of conversation with people who were saying they were Republicans but were going to vote for Hilldog, or the Obamamessiah.  The conversation continued but seemed to engulf more and more people as time went on.  Nothing bad.  Everyone was civil.
 
I just continued to read my book.
 
Inevitably a couple behind me took the opportunity of me taking a break from reading to ask me who I was voting for.  I am one who keeps his opinions to himself at the polling place.  I never answer exit pollers, that kind of thing.  So I was a bit perturbed about this turn of events.
 
I could have politely refused to answer their question.  I could have lied.  I could have chosen any of many options.
 
I have been under a tremedous amount of stress of late in my life.  Taking care of my wife while she's been going through chemo.  Work.  Having to take on a lot of my wife's rolls at home while she's been sick.  Dealin with my own impending surgery.  It hasn't been a great two months.
 
I should have realized this.  Had I realized this I wouldn't have responded the way I did:
 
"Frankly, I wouldn't p-ss on any of the current options if they were on fire."
 
They asked right?  That's what I said.  That's how I feel.  It was a completely honest statement.
 
That's how I roll.
 
Needless to say, the couple who asked me the question just stood there completely quiet.  It wasn't the response they were looking for I don't think.  But I did get one water spew and about 10 people laughing from those who heard me respond.
 
Then it was my turn and I went in and voted.
 
All in all it took about 30 mnutes of waiting.  It wasn't too bad.
 
And I like to think that maybe I made some others voting experience more enjoyable and perhaps opened a few eyes?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Gun Shops bad; Porn Shops Okey-Dokey

 
Barack Obama proposed a few years ago a federal law against licensed firearms dealers operating within five miles of a school or park. As Kopel notes, "Every town I've ever visited which has more than a few dozen inhabitants has either a school or a park. Hypothesizing that the ban would apply to city parks (e.g., Central Park in New York City) but not to National Parks, pick a geographical region, and describe where a licensed firearms dealer could operate. Or pick a geographic point (e.g, Houston)and identify how far a peson would have to drive in order to get to the closest point where a gun store could legally be located. Extra credit for illustrative maps."
 
As the commenters noted, this would effectively ban gun shops from most of the country, and just about every city.
 
However, Obama appears to find another kind of establishment to be perfectly fine operating near your children's school:
 
Obama was also the sole present vote on a bill that easily passed the Senate that would require teaching respect for others in schools. He also voted present on a measure to prohibit sex-related shops from opening near schools or places of worship, which ultimately did not pass the Senate.
 
In both of those cases, his campaign said, he was trying to avoid mandates on local authorities.

The bill did not get the required three-fifths majority, so it did not in fact pass. (Mr. Obama voted “present” on the measure.
)
 
I guess Obama does have experience in one area...NOT taking a stand on any but hardcore (heh) liberal issues.
 
So mandating ordinances on local authorities against guns is OK, but mandating ordinances on local authorities against porn shops is not OK?
 
Why is this guy doing so well again? 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rounds Out! - Another Hiatus?

Yes. 
 
Another one.
 
I have been blogging quite a bit of late.  It has been a great outlet for me, especially allowing me to vent and what not.  It's been a trying and hard six weeks though.
 
My wife has been undergoing chemotherapy.  She had her last treatment just this past Friday.  Thank goodness!  She is doing OK. 
 
Thanks to all for their prayers and support through this time.
 
Now the road to getting her strong again begins.  And that takes time.  And right in the middle of that I will have surgery next week which will put me down for a while as well. 
 
So the blogging will be light for awhile.  I will update from time to time and may be doing it more regularly after my surgery since I'll have some time on my hands...
 
But it's been a month and a half since my wife and I and our kids have been able to spend any real time together and it will be awhile longer after this weekend so we're going to take some time to ourselves this week and this weekend doing - whatever comes to mind.  My wife has a bit of the cabin fever as you would expect.  Perhaps I can stear her towards the Bass Pro Shops...
 
Again, thanks to everyone who offered their prayers to my wife and our family.  They were appreciated and helped her get through the chemo.
 
Ya'll are more of a blessing than you know...
 
God bless everyone and we'll announce when we're back regularly in due course.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »