Posted by
Catmman on Sunday, April 22, 2007 4:34:22 PM
Since it's Earth Day (how long before they call it Gaia's Holiday or some such nonsense) there are the myriad of GW, pro-environmentalism, and America's the problem stuff on the net and TV today.
As a matter of fact, I just went through a little 'photo essay' on MSN.com. It is a short slide show featuring 16 photos of the world's endangered destinations. Each photo is accompanied by a small descriptive caption.
After going through the show, I noticed some interesting things. I decided to take a sample of the photo's and add my own bit of analysis to them from the standpoint of common sense.
Photo #1: The Everglades, Florida.

Original caption: "Perhaps no region of the country is as vulnerable to climate change as Florida. Even a slight increase in temperature and water level could prove devastating to popular destinations like the Everglades, Miami Beach and the Keys."
Common Sense: Aren't the everglades already underwater? I've seen those guys on their air boats and such. I've watched numerous shows on Animal Planet about how the everglades needs to be underwater and how it is threatened by drought! Aren't those mangrove trees? Aren't they supposed to be underwater? Barring Al Gore, the IPCC has even stated the worst we could get is a seventeen inch rise in sea levels over 100 years. Call me crazy, but what's a foot and a half?
Photo #2: Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska

Original caption: "A sign in Kenai Fjords National Park indicates where the Exit Glacier reached in 1978; about a half-mile away from where it has receded to today. A jaw-dropping spectacle for the thousands of tourists who flock to Alaska each year, many Alaska glaciers are rapidly receding."
Common Sense: Yes, there are glaciers receding. But no mention of the additional expansion of glaciers in Antarctica. Notice anything peculiar about this photo? Take a close look. Notice all that lush green vegetation in place of where the glacier was 29 years ago? Just think of all the CO2 scrubbing the Earth would be robbed of if all the vegetation now exposed, were still under feet of ice! Do we want more ice, or do we want less CO2? Hmmm? Also, this glacier has only receded a half-mile since '78. I read some nonsense about how 23,000 fee
Photo #3: Dalian, China

Original Caption: "Fast-growing China, shown here during a prolonged heat wave last year, is opening about one coal plant every day this year. Along with the U.S., China is one of the world's leading contributors to the greenhouse gases believed to be largely responsible for the increase in the Earth's temperature." - (emphasis mine)
Common Sense: This is the only place I have seen anyone admit China being one of the leading contributors to GW. I couldn't believe it when I read it. No mention of how China, along with India, are exempt from the lefts beloved Kyoto Protocol. China opening one coal plant a year (or more) has never been an issue for the alarmists. The need for more fuel refining capacity in the US (since a new refinery hasn't been opened in this country for over 30 years) however, is enough to cause calls of universal armageddon from the enviro-wackos. One must have one's priorities, right Sheryl Crow?
Photo #4: Manhattan, New York City

Original Caption: "With high concentrations of population living just above sea level, New York and Los Angeles were listed in a recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as being at risk of potentially catastrophic "megafloods" resulting from rising oceans and stronger storms in the next century."
Common Sense: In this day and age, what is the greater threat to New York City: global warming or Islamonazis with a nuke? 'Nuff said.
Photo #5: Halong Bay, Vietnam

Original Caption: "With a high percentage of its population living along the coast, Vietnam faces considerable risk from the effects of global warming. Experts worry that developing nations may not have the resources available to thwart the dangers of climate change as readily as wealthier nations."
Common Sense: Apparently, we're to late to help these poor souls! Another alarmist photo. Some schlub sees this and says, "Those poor people! See sea levels are already rising! Do something!" What you won't see or read is that this is how these people live. They have adjusted their lifestyle to adapt to their surroundings as humans have since the beginning of time. These people live as they want to. It's probably how they make their living.
Last but not least: The Obligatory Polar Bear Apocalypse Pic!

Original Caption: Northwest Territories, Canada: "Polar bears have become one of the more obvious victims of the impact of global warming. With about 23,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice melting every year, the bears' hunting grounds are shrinking rapidly. Some scientists predict polar bears will be extinct in the next century. " - (emphasis mine)
Common Sense: See how the photo is supposed to make you believe this bear is running through water? The implication being the ice is melting. Also, no consensus? I though when it came to anything having to do with GW there was a worldwide consensus? These MSN caption writers are really off the ball. Also, since he's wet, he doesn't look as big. Due to GW you see his habitat is being destroyed so he can't eat! The horror!!!
Folks, the alarmism is just that. You'll constantly hear what the MSM and those with an agenda want you to hear. They do this to frighten you. They want you frightened so then you'll turn to them with your hands out and say "Help Us"
Don't be fooled by the movies. Try to look beyond a simple photograph. What is it that the photographer or publisher is really trying to say? These days, there is little want to inform from the MSM. They want you scared. They also want your money.

MSM (Corporate) Bias? - Google uses image of melting iceberg (glacier) on Earth Day
What do you think? Any influence peddling here?
Don't just listen to "consensus". Ask "What consensus?" Al Gore and the UN can't even agree on how high the sea levels will rise over the next century. Gore says 20 FEET! The UN say, maybe 17 INCHES!
If you want to conserve or change your lifestyle, that's great, but be sure your doing it for the right reasons. I do certain things in and around my home and when I drive, but it's not because the Goreacle said do it. I'm just trying to save money! But if i want to run my AC at 68 degrees every now and again, I should have the right to do so.
Ultimately folks, that's what it comes down to, your rights. Are you going to live your life the way you wish or are you going to have the government mandate how much toilet paper you can use?
Liberty is one of our most precious gifts my friends. Don't surrender it lightly!
If you enjoyed this little essay, please pass it on to your friends and family and others.