About Me

Name: Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Al Gore - Real 'Climatologist'

Mr. Gore is receiving his degree in climatology.  Oh. My. God.

Yes, you heard that right.  Albeit an honorary degree.

Read about it on Newsbuster here.  Full story here.

From Newsbusters:

"Just imagine, folks: in a period of a few months, this charlatan could win a Nobel Peace Prize, an Academy Award, and receive an honorary doctorate in climatology -- all for spreading fallacious and unproven theories around the world!

Can someone point me in the direction of the nearest water closet?

Amazing. This guy makes a science fiction schlockumentary creating unwarranted hysteria about an unproven theory, and an American university wants to give him a degree? You’ve got to be kidding?

Alas, it appears not."

I have like, 20-30 posts about climate change on this blog and I'm not a hack.  Can I get one?  Maybe I'll e-mail UoM and ask.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Appeal for Courage - A Real Appeal for Redress

In response to the cowards on active duty, we have this:

Appeal for Courage - An Appeal for Redress.

Here is the text of the Appeal:

As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.

Nature of Grievance:
  1. Emphasis of coalition failures while ignoring our successes gives encouragement and motivation to enemies, increasing personal risk and lengthening the war.
  2. Criticism of military motives and strategy, specifically calls for withdrawal without providing alternatives, demoralizes fellow service members and the American public depended upon for support.

This is for active duty service personnel only to sign.  Please pass on the word to anyone you know in the military service who may want to support this.  It only takes a few minutes (not even that long).

This is a way for us on active duty to express our dissatisfaction with the congressional leadership in this nation calling for our defeat.  If you can't sign, please pass on the info.  There are other ways to support as well.  Just go to the above link for further.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dilbert for the Day

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate Change: Too complex for computer models

or "Why models predicting future outcome suck!" or "What will the temp be on February 20, 2107: How the H*ll should I know."

Newsbusters has a great analysis of a NYT article about computer modeling in researching global 'climate change.' 

Oh, didn't you know?  It's no longer 'global warming' it is now 'global climate change.'

Anyway, this is a great look at how current climate modelers can't get past their own biases.  It also states the patently obvious that trying to 'model' something like climate is almost impossible.  Too many variables; too much complexity in the system.  Kind of like 'chaos theory' in Jurassic Park.

The analogy with your local weather man is true.  They can tell you with some degree of accuracy what it will be like outside tomorrow.  But the further away you get from the present moment, too many variables affect the accuracy of their forecasts. 

Question for GCC advocates:  If this modeling is so all fired accurate, why can't I use it to predict lotto numbers for the next thousand years?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Organic Food: Not as 'green' as we think

Another nail in the environmentalists coffin.

"The energy needed to grow organic tomatoes is 1.9 times that of conventional methods, the study found. Organic milk requires 80 per cent more land to produce than conventional milk and creates 20 per cent more carbon dioxide, it says. The use of manure to fertilize land can lead to acidification of soil and the pollution of water courses.  Organic chickens require 25 per cent more energy to rear and produce more carbon dioxide than conventional battery or barn hens, according to the report." - excerpt

One aspect this article doesn't take into account is cost.  Have you ever looked at how much 'organic' stuff costs?  By and large it is usually more expensive to buy than 'conventionally' grown/produced stuff.  It can also be less healthy and contain more contaminants than 'regular' food.  Now you know why.  It costs more to produce - more energy, more land, more everything.

What also strikes me is the caveats placed in this story.  If you read it, you'll see it.  These same caveats would NOT be placed in an article promoting organic foods.

Only when you get a story which flows against the activists, do you get 'unbiased' reporting.  Still a very good and informative article.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Wicca a religion?

Maybe I'm looking at this through biased lenses.  You know, lenses biased by Christianity.

This article is a bunch of convoluted crap to me.  I particularly disagree with how it attempts to give wicca credence by stating how many military people are in it.

I find this reasoning to be a bit convoluted:  "In Iraq, I saw what was happening in the name of Allah and I thought, 'This has got to stop.' . . . The common core of all religions, we're saying the same stuff," he says. "I just decided that the rest of my life I will encourage people to seek out the light however they see fit, through the Bhagavad-Gita, the Torah, the writings of prophets and sages -- whatever path propels them to be good and honorable and upright."

No mention of salvation, curious. 

If you read the article, this guy pretty much rails against religion, primarily Christianity.  "I realized so many innocent people are dying again in the name of God," Larsen says. "When you think back over the Catholic-Protestant conflict, how the Jews have suffered, how some Christians justified slavery, the Crusades, and now the fighting between Shiite and Sunni Muslims, I just decided I'm done. . . . I will not be part of any church that unleashes its clergy to preach that particular individuals or faith groups are damned."

For one thing, the Crusades weren't just a one sided Christian religious war.  Secondly, in my experience I've never had a military Chaplain "unleashed" on me or anyone I know.

He is damning other religions for preaching what they do.  He says he doesn't believe in other religions preaching a "gospel", yet praises his current faith and uses it in proselytizing it's benefits.  Maybe I didn't state that clearly, but I do sense hypocrisy in this article.

They don't like wicca being referrer to as "witchcraft, yet state that's exactly what it is later:  "You can't intellectually talk about witchcraft. You gotta show up," he says. "What Carl Jung, Joseph Campbell and a lot of us universalists think is, people need the magical side, the mythological side, of religion.

I believe that one only enters Heaven through salvation granted by God through Jesus Christ.  'Nuff said.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chemical Warfare in Iraq?

Chlorine truck rigged to explode - killed six, injured many more.

They've tried it before.  This time it worked, if even on a smaller scale than planned.

CNN has the story here as well.  Update: Reuters.

An obvious escalation in the terrorists tactics.  What is our response?  What is the Iraqi response?  It remains to be seen.

Have any of you ever been exposed the chemical agents?  This is no way to die. 

Terrorist WMD's on the cheap.  What do we do if these wackos succeed in this at some point and kill thousands?

Questions:  What do we do if this happens here?  Our highways and cities are filled with trucks delivering this type of stuff, some of it much more dangerous.  How hard is it to derail a tanker train?

(Thanks to Hot Air for the links)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

1 in 6 in poverty in Europe

European socialism.  Apparently a big success. 

How can so many be in poverty when most of the governments in Europe "provide" everything for their citizens?

They get free everything right?  Maybe there is so much poverty because all this "social engineering" isn't free.

Cradle to grave, wait-in-line health care.  How much parental leave do they get?  6-12 months?  Paying people to have babies.  Welfare out the ying-yang. 

It's funny.  These people seem shocked there is so much unemployment.  What is the incentive to work?  If government is "providing" so much, why waste your time with a job.  Duh.

This is just another direction to point to.  The same thing will happen here if we let it.  Dems/libs can demagogue the economy with an unemployment rate of 4.5%?  What will they say if it becomes 12-15%?

That's what we'll get if we let them make those of us who work, those of us who contribute, do even more.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's the Cows man!

The vegans are on the march.  Now your burger is more dangerous to global climate than your car!

That's right.  Here it is right here.

"American meat eaters are responsible for 1.5 more tons of carbon dioxide per person than vegetarians every year". - excerpt

I guess Al Gore and all his ilk need to now convert to vegetarianism, huh?  I mean, how can we take then seriously if they won't do everything within their power to help the climate?

"Livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions as measured in carbon dioxide equivalent, reports the FAO. This includes 9 percent of all CO2 emissions, 37 percent of methane, and 65 percent of nitrous oxide. Altogether, that's more than the emissions caused by transportation. The latter two gases are particularly troubling – even though they represent far smaller concentrations in atmosphere than CO2, which remains the main global warming culprit. But methane has 23 times the global warming potential (GWP) of CO2 and nitrous oxide has 296 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide." - excerpt

If that is true, then why are we going to bankrupt economies worrying about CO2?  Why trade in 'carbon credits'?  Seems like we'll need to levy additional taxes on Dentists and street racers. 

"As prosperity increased around the world in recent decades, the number of people eating meat (and the amount one eats every year) has risen steadily." - excerpt

There you go, prosperity is BAAAAD!

Not that this is apolitical or anything but, "Animal-rights activists and those advocating vegetarianism have been quick to pick up on the implications of the FAO report."

And the endgame?  "It doesn't have to be all the way to the extreme end of vegan," says Dr. Eshel, whose family raised beef cattle in Israel. "If you simply cut down from two burgers a week to one, you've already made a substantial difference."

So.  One burger is OK, but two equals global calamity and is a "substantial difference".

I have to go now and grill up a 9 ounce, center cut fillet.  Rare of course because I don't want to use more energy than absolutely necessary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No wonder it's called the Big Easy!

Apparently because they've never worked for anything in their lives! 

I am sick and freakin tired!  Read this tripe



Do you see that photo?  Can/will anyone in this city take responsibility for anything?

The people of New Orleans are pissed because no one will help with the crime problem?  Well, you morons re-elected Mayor "Chocolate" Nagin, right?  What the hell did you think you were getting?

You people have been given more than your fair share of everything since Katrina - money, welfare, relief, even other states are still taking care of your evacuees!  Benefits for "displaced" people were extended yet again until May 2007 - almost two years after the bloody hurricane.

America's Baghdad?  Maybe it should be.  Maybe we should just roll in there and take everything out.  I mean, how attached to it are you?  You still haven't re-built 3/4 of the city and the hurricane was a year and a half ago!

Why don't you people quit b**ching and take responsibility for yourselves!  I know it will be a novel concept.  Try wiping your own noses for once.  They're your problems.  You elected the government.  It was your cops who deserted their posts and joined in the looting.  They are your criminals.

Stop whining to America! I don't think we owe you anything else!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Teachers Unions worse than terrorist nuke

Neil Boortz thinks so.  Take a look over at Hot Air.  Video added.

Compelling argument, but a bit of a stretch.

Don't get me wrong, I hate the NEA and their ilk, but I don't really think this is a fair comparison.

Maybe if Al Qaeda nuked the NEA...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Orleans - Shut the H*LL up!

I am sick and freakin tired!  Read this tripe.



Do you see that photo?  Can/will anyone in this city take responsibility for anything?

The people of New Orleans are pissed because no one will help with the crime problem?  Well, you morons re-elected Mayor "Chocolate" Nagin, right?  What the hell did you think you were getting?

You people have been given more than your fair share of everything since Katrina - money, welfare, relief, even other states are still taking care of your evacuees!  Benefits for "displaced" people were extended yet again until May 2007 - almost two years after the bloody hurricane.

America's Baghdad?  Maybe it should be.  Maybe we should just roll in there and take everything out.  I mean, how attached to it are you?  You still haven't re-built 3/4 of the city and the hurricane was a year and a half ago!

Why don't you people quit b**ching and take responsibility for yourselves!  I know it will be a novel concept.  Try wiping your own noses for once.  They're your problems.  You elected the government.  It was your cops who deserted their posts and joined in the looting.  They are your criminals.

Stop whining to America! I don't think we owe you anything else!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Earth Warmer/Seas Higher 125,000 Years Ago

But, there weren't any evil internal combustion engines then.  Or evil conservatives burning Gias blood poluting the air.

"Approximately 125,000 years ago, the Earth was around three to five degrees Celsius warmer on average than it is today and sea levels were four to six meters higher. The ice sheets covering Greenland's land mass have trapped a significant amount of that water that used to be in the sea, thereby lowering sea levels, Susan Solomon, senior scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (and the co-chair of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) told attendees at the American Association for the Advancement of Science taking place in San Francisco." - excerpt

Newsbusters has the whole story.

"If the land ice on Greenland were to melt completely, the sea levels could rise six or seven meters again, but the current scientific models indicate it will take thousands of years. Both land and sea ice around Greenland are currently melting. (Sea ice is also melting, but it doesn't raise sea levels because it's already in the water.)" - excerpt

"It would take centuries, if not millennia, to get a four to six meter rise" in sea levels, she said. Global temperatures would have to be raised by 1.9 to 4.6 degrees Celsius and be kept that way for several centuries, she added.  - excerpt

More detail from C/Net News.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bruce Lee vs. Chuck Norris!

For no reason whatsoever!  Enjoy!

This was right before Chuck Norris was reincarnated and ruled the world!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LA Times complicit with Iranian Fauxtography!

We had the question out there:  How long would it be before a western news agency ran these pics as real news.  Well, here's the answer - 1 day:   (It's the whole story otherwise you'd have to register)  Follow the post to the bottom for links to my original post and a update from LGF.

Iran alleges U.S. link to militant attack

Tehran worries that America is helping Iranian opposition groups foment instability.
By Kim Murphy, Times Staff Writer
February 19, 2007

Bullet cartridges bearing a U.S. insignia and English lettering were among the weaponry seized last week from Sunni militants suspected of killing 11 members of Shiite-dominated Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard, Iranian officials said Sunday.

A photo of the cartridge box, along with an array of other ammunition, was published by Iranian newspapers and news agencies.

Iran did not provide access to the weapons and explosives, drawing skepticism from analysts, and there was no way of evaluating the claims independently. But Tehran is clearly worried that the U.S. is quietly helping Iranian opposition groups foment instability, even while the Bush administration is confronting Iran over its nuclear program and accusing it of arming Shiite militants in Iraq.

The Iranian allegations came a week after U.S. officials laid out what they said was evidence of Iranian-made weapons in Iraq. That evidence also was inconclusive, and Iran denied supplying arms to Iraqi combatants.

A Pentagon spokeswoman, Marine Maj. Rebecca Goodrich-Hinton, said Sunday that officials had no comment about the allegations from Tehran.

Iranian officials in the southeastern region of Sistan-Baluchistan, where a bus carrying the Revolutionary Guard troops was struck Wednesday by explosives from a booby-trapped car, announced the accusations of U.S. and British involvement in the attack.

"Washington and London are facing serious challenges as their interests in the Middle East region have been endangered," an unnamed local official, identified as the province's political director, told the semiofficial Fars news agency. "Since the Islamic Republic is the main center of anti-U.S. struggles, they are seeking to trouble Iran through a series of challenges, including terrorist attacks and unrests."

He said weapons used in the attack, which wounded 31 people, were made by the U.S. and Britain. "Moreover, the arrested terrorist agents have confessed that they have been trained by English-speaking people," the official said.

In the last year, Iran has seen a wave of protests and bombings from non-Shiite minorities, especially Sunni Muslims living along the nation's western border with Iraq and its eastern border with Pakistan and Afghanistan, where two bombings occurred last week.

Sunnis make up about 8% of Iran's population and have long complained of repression and discrimination by the Shiite-dominated government. Though there are an estimated 1 million Sunnis in Tehran, the government has not allowed construction of a single Sunni mosque in the capital.

Three people were reportedly hanged in the oil-rich southwestern province of Khuzestan this month in connection with a series of deadly bombings last year. Seven others in the case were previously executed, reports say.

Ethnic Azeris and Kurds also have been increasingly militant in favor of greater autonomy, and the violence last week in Sistan-Baluchistan is the latest in a wave of unrest among ethnic Baluch on both sides of the Iran-Pakistan border.

Responsibility for the bus bombing and an explosion the next day was claimed by the Sunni militant group Jundallah, or God's Brigade, which has been blamed for previous attacks on Iranian troops in the region.

Stratfor, a Texas-based security and intelligence firm, said in a report Saturday that the attacks "fall in line with U.S. efforts to supply and train Iran's ethnic minorities to destabilize the Iranian regime." It said a "covert intelligence war" between Iran and the U.S. is "well underway."

But other analysts said a large amount of U.S. military equipment supplied to Iran in the years before the 1979 Islamic Revolution was still in use, and the existence of U.S.-manufactured ammunition did not prove American involvement.

The analysts said unrest in Iran was more likely a reflection of the ethnic nationalism that is creating conflict in multiethnic nations across the globe, including the former Soviet Union, former Yugoslavia and Spain.

"We're living in a period in history when multinational states break up. And why should Iran be the exception?" said Edward N. Luttwak, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

"I'd be very surprised if the level of violence by the Kurds and the Baluch doesn't increase, or indeed if the Sunni Arabs in [Khuzestan] stop agitating. It's a natural thing," he said.


kim.murphy@latimes.com


A link to my original postHere.  Also an updated link over at LGF.

Kim Murphy - Moron.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive