About Me

Name:Catmman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Hillary's Village

Here we go again with Hillary!

She was on "The View" the other day promoting the re-relaease of her (ghostwritten) book "It Takes a Village".  She also more or less said she was going to run for President in '08 by saying it was about time a "mother" run for and be elected as President.

A mother?!  Since when has Hillary been a mother?

The Clintons have been in governement (their own) service for over twenty years.  Before that, Hillary herself constantly touts the fact she was a professional woman - a lawyer, student at prestigous universities, etc.  Again, when did she have the time to be a mother?

Oh, wait - this is where the "village" comes in.  How many nannies did the Clintons employ over the years?  How many specialty schools did they ship Chelsea off too when she was younger?  How many others in the "village" actually "mothered" Chelsea? 

Mine and most other people have a different opinion as to what a mother is and I'll use my family as an example.  My wife and I made a concsious decision before we married that my wife would stay home and raise our children.  I know - I'm just a sexist neanderthal.  Anyway, we decided we would sacrifice and otherwise do without for the sake of our children.  My wife deferred job and profession to be a stay at home wife/mother.  We didn't rely on nannies, day care, or even other family members to raise our children.  To us, this made perfect sense - why have children if you aren't going to be the ones raising them?  Villages don't raise children, parents do beginning with the mother.  Parents love, heal, nurture and otherwise rear children, villages don't have this capacity.

Because of the route my wife and I took in rearing our children (we have three), they don't need a village, they are self-sufficient and confident enough in themselves to take care of themselves through life.  The "village" is the route of dependency, the route of victimization, the route of mediocrity - there is no chance for individual achievement or excellence, self-reliance.

The difference between Hillary and most mothers is that Hillary (the Clintons) don't do anything without calculation and premeditation - how will this benefit ME at the expense of forsaking the child.  Real mothers and parents forsake themselves for the benefit of their children.

For my part, my wife is more of a mother than Hillary could ever hope to be in every sense of the word.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

60+ years of Abandonment!

We abandoned eastern Europe after WWII. 

We abandoned the Cubans at the Bay of Pigs in the 60's.

We abandoned South Vietnam in the 70's.

We abandoned Lebanon in the 80's.

We abandoned the Kurds and Somalis in the 90's.

We now have a plan in place to abandon the Iraqi's in this new century.

The legacy of all these mistakes of political policy resulted in decades/generations, of war, genocide and the loss of national honor.

I will forever be ashamed that my legacy after 20+ years of military service will be to leave my children and grandchildren with more problems and most certainly future, more deadly wars.

America has lost it's way.  When we are willing to sacrifice Victory and Justice for political expediency and moral relativism, it seems we may be doomed to discover too late our mistakes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I've had it!

This is it.  I've had it!  I've really, really had it!

This nation has really begun it's inevitable slide into the morass of moral and military vacuousness!

I remember when I was a kid.  Back in the early eighties, my Dad told me about Vietnam and the issues which arose as a result of the defeat we should have never experienced, yet did. 

It seemed at the time that America was beginning to understand what it had done to itself as a result of the social policies and politics of that era.  Reagan became President and America renewed it's strength.  The military regained it's honor throughout the eighties and into the early nineties.

Now, more than five years after we were attacked and the islamofascists began their quest for domination with alacrity, we get this load of defeat-o-speak, the ISG!

As a member of the AF currently on active duty, my first reaction was we have men and women fighting and dying in Iraq and instead of letting us kill the SOB's responsible, our governments best solution is to initiate a study group?!   I can hear it from the soldiers now: "Our new SECDEF has said we're losing, this ISG says we're losing, what am I still doing here?  Send me home."

The taking of support from the military effort in Iraq is tantamount to what happened after Vietnam.  A few years ago we heard stories of people giving up 1st class airline seats to returning soldiers; now the public seems like it could care less.

The worst thing is that this seems to be exactly what the government wants.  Foment dissatisfaction.  Delude the morale of the fighters.  Begin the domino effect of defeat, now more fervently than ever.

What kills me is that the American people don't understand what this is going to cost us in the long run. 

I hate to say this, but I don't know if I'll be able to continue my service if my own government isn't going to support the mission I've sworn to.  I'll retire.  I don't know if I could sacrifice my personal honor continuing to work for politicians who continually refuse to learn the lessons of history and allow us to be defeated by a less than honorable enemy.

If I take that road, I only wish that the politicians in power would do the same.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »